[8u-dev] Request for approval for JDK-8208638 : Instead of circle rendered in appl window, but ellipse is produced in JEditorPane
Phil Race
philip.race at oracle.com
Mon Oct 1 17:55:19 UTC 2018
The 11 process documented here :
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk-updates/approval.html
does not say anything about email .. so it is not clear .. it only talks
about updating the bug report.
So at least follow the process written there.
-phil.
On 10/01/2018 10:50 AM, Krishna Addepalli wrote:
> Hi Alan and Phil
>
> Thanks for your comments. I’m currently cloning the 11u repo. So, I
> need to send the mail to jdk11u-dev at openjdk.java.net
> <mailto:jdk11u-dev at openjdk.java.net> for back port request?
>
> Krishna
>
>> On 01-Oct-2018, at 9:59 PM, Philip Race <philip.race at oracle.com
>> <mailto:philip.race at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I'd go further .. it probably shouldn't go into 8u *without* a
>> concurrent 11u backport.
>> else (as others have pointed out) when you upgrade from 8u to 11u it
>> regresses
>> which is against a "big rule".
>>
>> -phil.
>>
>> On 10/1/18, 2:40 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> On 28/09/2018 02:11, Krishna Addepalli wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> Could you please approve the backport of the jdk12 fix to 8u-dev?
>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208638
>>>> webrev:
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kaddepalli/8208638/8udev/webrev/
>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ekaddepalli/8208638/8udev/webrev/>
>>>> The patch is same except for the path difference between jdk12 and
>>>> jdk8u.
>>>> JDk12 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/client/rev/2105d8064ca2
>>>> JDK12 review thread:
>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2018-September/008907.html
>>>>
>>> I'm not involved in JDK updates but a back port from JDK 12 to 8u
>>> does beg the question as to whether the change will also be
>>> backported to 11u. I see there is discussion on jdk-updates-dev
>>> about the approvals for 11u but in the mean time then maybe backport
>>> issues should be created to at least track what will otherwise be
>>> regressions moving from 8u to 11u.
>>>
>>> -Alan
>
More information about the jdk8u-dev
mailing list