[8u-dev] RFA (XS): JDK-8211394: CHECK_ must be used in the rhs of an assignment statement within a block

David Buck david.buck at oracle.com
Fri Oct 19 00:40:23 UTC 2018


Hi Paul!

Please add an appropriate noreg label [0] to the JBS bug report.

Once that is done please consider this approved for push to 8u-dev.

Cheers,
-Buck

[0] https://openjdk.java.net/guide/changePlanning.html#noreg

On 2018/10/19 9:29, David Holmes wrote:
> On 19/10/2018 2:44 AM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Did the jprt job go ok? If so, Rob or Sean, would you please approve 
>> the backport?
> 
> Yes - sorry. Didn't expect it to hold this up as it's so trivial.
> 
> David
> 
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> On 10/16/18, 7:06 PM, "David Holmes" <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>      On 17/10/2018 8:23 AM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
>>      > Please approve a trivial backport of JDK-8211394 to 8u.
>>      >
>>      > JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8211394
>>      >
>>      > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8211394/webrev.00/
>>      > <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ephh/8211394/webrev.00/>
>>      >
>>      > Review thread:
>>      > 
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2018-October/030376.html 
>>
>>      >
>>      > The patch applies cleanly net of line numbers, copyright notice
>>      > dates, and code that exists in JDK9 but not in JDK8. The result 
>> is a one
>>      > line change and a new comment.
>>      Looks fine.
>>      > It builds and runs jdk8 hotspot jtreg test on a linux x64 host. If
>>      > needed, would someone please run it through jprt?
>>      It doesn't really warrant it but I fired it off anyway.
>>      Thanks,
>>      David
>>      > Thanks,
>>      >
>>      > Paul
>>      >
>>


More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list