[8u-dev] RFA (XS): JDK-8211394: CHECK_ must be used in the rhs of an assignment statement within a block
David Buck
david.buck at oracle.com
Fri Oct 19 00:40:23 UTC 2018
Hi Paul!
Please add an appropriate noreg label [0] to the JBS bug report.
Once that is done please consider this approved for push to 8u-dev.
Cheers,
-Buck
[0] https://openjdk.java.net/guide/changePlanning.html#noreg
On 2018/10/19 9:29, David Holmes wrote:
> On 19/10/2018 2:44 AM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Did the jprt job go ok? If so, Rob or Sean, would you please approve
>> the backport?
>
> Yes - sorry. Didn't expect it to hold this up as it's so trivial.
>
> David
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> On 10/16/18, 7:06 PM, "David Holmes" <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 17/10/2018 8:23 AM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
>> > Please approve a trivial backport of JDK-8211394 to 8u.
>> >
>> > JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8211394
>> >
>> > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8211394/webrev.00/
>> > <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ephh/8211394/webrev.00/>
>> >
>> > Review thread:
>> >
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2018-October/030376.html
>>
>> >
>> > The patch applies cleanly net of line numbers, copyright notice
>> > dates, and code that exists in JDK9 but not in JDK8. The result
>> is a one
>> > line change and a new comment.
>> Looks fine.
>> > It builds and runs jdk8 hotspot jtreg test on a linux x64 host. If
>> > needed, would someone please run it through jprt?
>> It doesn't really warrant it but I fired it off anyway.
>> Thanks,
>> David
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Paul
>> >
>>
More information about the jdk8u-dev
mailing list