[8u] RFR: 8186576: [2/2] KerberosTicket does not properly handle renewable tickets at the end of their lifetime

Hohensee, Paul hohensee at amazon.com
Mon Dec 2 22:06:11 UTC 2019


Ping for another review pls.

Thanks,
Paul

On 11/18/19, 3:48 PM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Hohensee, Paul" <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of hohensee at amazon.com> wrote:

    Lgtm. I looked at [1/2] JDK-8044500 first, and same request applies: would another reviewer also take a look please?
    
    Thanks,
    
    Paul
    
    On 11/8/19, 11:39 AM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Verghese, Clive" <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of verghese at amazon.com> wrote:
    
        Hi,
        
        Requesting review for backport of JDK-8186576.
        
        JDK-8186576
        JBS Issues : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8186576
        Original Change : http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/rev/fa7582840977
        Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alvdavi/webrevs/8186576/webrev.8u.00/
        
        
        The backport did not apply cleanly, It required changes from JDK-804450. The test case written for JDK-8186576, specifically NullRenewUntil, was requesting renewable tickets, support for which was added in JDK-8044500.
        Additionally parts of JDK-8044500 had already been backported.
        
        We could
        
          1.  Add the required functions and update the tests. Or
          2.  Backport JDK-8044500
        
        I have backported both JDK-8044500 and JDK-8186576.
        
        Other than the usual changes to filenames and copyrights, The patches also needed minor modifications mentioned below.
        
        JDK-8186576
        
          *   Variable name change in KDC.java
          *   Missing ‘{‘ in the if blocks in KerberosTicket.java
        
        
        Regards,
        Clive Verghese
        
    
    



More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list