RFD: Draft guidelines for working on jdk8u

[Martin Balao]

On 2/7/19 3:01 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> 
> Comments welcome.
> 

I'd like to propose that for trivial backports/changes (i.e.: typos,
copyright fixes, etc.), a jdk8u reviewer approval is enough to have the
patch in. In case that a reviewer is not sure about the triviality of a
backport/change, other reviewers or maintainer approval may be required.
This would reduce unnecessary overhead I believe.