Proposal for back-porting JFR to OpenJDK8u

Andrew Hughes gnu.andrew at redhat.com
Thu Jan 31 16:37:46 UTC 2019


On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 00:45, Hohensee, Paul <hohensee at amazon.com> wrote:
>
> The backport is on the EnableJFR switch is true, but it's default false in the patch, so JFR is default off.
>
> Paul
>

That's at runtime, right? I'm thinking more about the possibility of
it breaking the build
on some architectures.

We're still in a state of flux with jdk8u right now, until a new lead
is assigned, but I'm
thinking it makes sense to keep both the jdk8u and jdk8u-dev
repositories, and do
releases from the former after they've baked in the latter. With
something like this,
it may even be worth getting a further tree where it can be tested and
worked on,
without the pressure of the three month update cycle.
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222


More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list