Shenandoah and aarch64

Roman Kennke rkennke at redhat.com
Sun Jul 14 11:17:44 UTC 2019


The only reason would be that I'd strongly suggest to wait for the LRB
and elimination-of-forwarding pointer backports to arrive. And they are
going to arrive in 11 first (I already have them ready and lined up to
get pushed), and probably need some time to be done for 8 because this
is a whole different story because 8 doesn't have any of the GC interfaces.

Roman

> +1, though no reason it can't be done at the same time.
> 
> Paul
> 
> On 7/12/19, 4:08 AM, "Severin Gehwolf" <sgehwolf at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>     On Fri, 2019-07-12 at 12:36 +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
>     > I am wondering if Shenandoah (with LRB and related improvements)
>     > should go into 11u first?
>     
>     That makes a lot of sense.
>     
>     Thanks,
>     Severin
>     
>     
> 



More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list