RFR(XS): 8219961: [ppc64] Increase code size for interpreter generation.

[Andrew John Hughes]

On 04/03/2019 09:22, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> Thanks Martin!
> 
> Best regards,
>   Goetz.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Doerr, Martin
>> Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 10:06 AM
>> To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com>; Lindenmaier, Goetz
>> <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net; hotspot-
>> dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: RE: RFR(XS): 8219961: [ppc64] Increase code size for interpreter
>> generation.
>>
>> Hi Götz,
>>
>> reviewed. I think it's critical enough for 8u (instead of 8u-dev). Risk seems to
>> be very low.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jdk8u-dev <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On Behalf Of
>> Andrew Haley
>> Sent: Freitag, 1. März 2019 15:46
>> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>; jdk8u-
>> dev at openjdk.java.net; hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: Re: RFR(XS): 8219961: [ppc64] Increase code size for interpreter
>> generation.
>>
>> On 3/1/19 6:49 AM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
>>> If an agent is specified, the VM does not start on ppc64.
>>> The space for the template interpreter does not suffice any more.
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr19/8219961-ppc64_interpreter_8/01/
>>
>> OK, thanks.
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Haley
>> Java Platform Lead Engineer
>> Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
>> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671

This seems to have been pushed to the wrong tree (jdk8u rather than
jdk8u-dev):

https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot/rev/111b95ad4584

It also looks like the bug system is still assigning 'openjdk8u' to
jdk8u pushes.

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8219961
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
https://keybase.io/gnu_andrew