Shall we tag 212 for openjfx?

[Kevin Rushforth]

OpenJFX is a separate Project in OpenJDK. The openjfx/8u code line 
currently has no maintainer. Unless and until a suitable maintainer 
steps forward, there is no point in tagging it (and without a 
maintainer, no one with any standing to do so). See this message [1] 
sent to the openjfx-dev mailing list.

-- Kevin

[1] 
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2019-January/023039.html


On 3/19/2019 2:48 PM, Liu, Xin wrote:
> Hi, Community,
>
> A JDK8u distribution need to include OpenJFX, but I found that the openjfx-8u repo doesn’t have a tag corresponding to 212.
> https://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u-dev/rt/tags
> https://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u/rt/tags
>
> Is it intentional? If we don’t have any change of JFX into 212 release, shall we tag it or just fall back to use 8u202-ga?
>
> Thanks,
> --lx
>