JFR backport status

[Andrew Haley]

On 4/30/19 4:49 PM, Mario Torre wrote:
> That makes sense, and I'm all for going towards what makes the
> maintainers life easier.
> 
> We can use the bug ID I created and then reference individual fixes
> one by one or go back to the first plan and use multiple bug ids (or
> just the core jfr even if the patch is reworked).
> 
> Andrew Haley, what do you think? Given that this will be merged into
> 8u-dev at some point I think this should be really your decision on
> what bug to use.

As long as all of the bug IDs are marked as having been merged into
JDK 8u I'm happy. Having a master bug ID for the port makes sense too,
so there's nothing that's ideal. You're the hard-working miners at the
coal face, so in the end it has to be whatever you're comfortable
with.

I'll note that, again, our development process seems to be determined
by the need to keep the tooling happy...

-- 
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671