jdk11u-dev is now switched to 11.0.5

[Lindenmaier, Goetz]

Hi Andrew, 

(sorry for the double mail, resent this to all.)

> The level of bureaucratic overhead in these projects is getting absurd. We're
> going to have to do something about it before we all drown.

Yes, there is some overhead, it does not make things more 
simple.  You could delegate some tasks.

E.g., 
  * I would volunteer to trigger the update of the JBS version 
     For 11 whenever needed.
  * You could allow to push the version bump without 
     jdk11u-fix-yes tag. It's obvious we need it.

Further, I would propose that we exclude all changes Oracle 
pushes to their 11.0.x from the tagging if pushed to 
the open 11.0.x (same x!).
They have already been judged to be good for downport by Oracle. 
The "Fix Request" comment should be added to the change
nevertheless. This way one can know that a change is being
worked on.  Maybe we should note in the bug that it is a downport 
that went to Oracle's 11.0.x, so it's clear why it is not tagged.

Best regards,
  Goetz.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 11:17 AM
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>
> Subject: Re: jdk11u-dev is now switched to 11.0.5
> 
> On 5/30/19 9:44 AM, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote:
> 
> > Could you please tag
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224838
> > 8224838: Bump update version for OpenJDK: jdk-11.0.5
> 
> Done.
> 
> The level of bureaucratic overhead in these projects is getting absurd. We're
> going to have to do something about it before we all drown.
> 
> --
> Andrew Haley
> Java Platform Lead Engineer
> Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
> https://keybase.io/andrewhaley
> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671