[8u] [JFR] RFR: JFR backports from 11.0.4

[Langer, Christoph]

Hi Andrey,

I approved these patches in 11u. They all seem to be viable candidates for backports.

Best regards
Christoph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdk8u-dev <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On Behalf Of
> Andrey Petushkov
> Sent: Donnerstag, 5. September 2019 17:55
> To: Mario Torre <neugens at redhat.com>
> Cc: jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: [8u] [JFR] RFR: JFR backports from 11.0.4
> 
> Hi Mario,
> 
> The following fixes apply trivially to jdk11u, so I've requested the permission
> to backport per process.
> 
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8220555
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221711
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8222888
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221569
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8216283
> 
> The rest require some rework, I'll post RFRs soon
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrey
> 
> > On 4 Sep 2019, at 17:47, Mario Torre <neugens at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Awesome, thanks for checking zero.
> >
> > As discussed offline, we have a few backports that were directly
> > backported to 8u without first being in 11u:
> >
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8185525
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223599
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225310
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221711
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8222888
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8216283
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8220555
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8217362
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221569
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224217
> >
> > A couple of those are wither being worked on or of interest for 11u,
> > so they should be fine, some aren't and while may not be critical I
> > think they are nice to have (like the container tests), so I would
> > expect all of them to be backported to 11u.
> >
> > Since this is a staging repository we may go ahead and push them and
> > work on the backport to 11 afterward, but I would prefer to not create
> > a discrepancy at this moment, so if possible we should work on the
> > backports to 11 first.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mario
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 4:09 PM Andrey Petushkov <andrey at azul.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Mario,
> >>
> >> zero build is fine (e.g. mentioned method has default no-op
> implementation in vm_version.hpp)
> >>
> >> Andrey
> >>
> >>> On 4 Sep 2019, at 12:52, Mario Torre <neugens at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 03/09/2019 13:53, Andrey Petushkov wrote:
> >>>> Dear All,
> >>>>
> >>>> could you please consider the following set of backports of the JFR
> fixes from 11.0.4 release into 8u incubator baseline:
> >>>
> >>> This seems good, the only nit I have now is that some of those changes
> >>> may break zero again, I think it may make sense to fix it in this patch
> >>> set instead of filing a dedicated bug report later.
> >>>
> >>> See for example:
> >>>
> >>> JDK-8219241
> >>>
> >>> +void VM_Version::print_platform_virtualization_info(outputStream*
> st) {
> >>>
> >>> etc..
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Mario
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Mario Torre
> >>> Associate Manager, Software Engineering
> >>> Red Hat GmbH <https://www.redhat.com>
> >>> 9704 A60C B4BE A8B8 0F30  9205 5D7E 4952 3F65 7898
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mario Torre
> > Associate Manager, Software Engineering
> > Red Hat GmbH <https://www.redhat.com>
> > 9704 A60C B4BE A8B8 0F30  9205 5D7E 4952 3F65 7898