[8u] RFR 8160768: Add capability to custom resolve host/domain names within the default JNDI LDAP provider
Zhengyu Gu
zgu at redhat.com
Fri Aug 7 12:47:53 UTC 2020
Hi Paul,
Based on Alan Bateman's comment, we can not backport public API to 8u. I
guess LdapDnsProvider.java and LdapDnsProviderResult.java have to be
moved to com.sun.jndi.ldap and com.sun.jndi.ldap.spi packages.
I will withdraw this CSR, ok?
Thanks,
-Zhengyu
On 8/6/20 5:32 PM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
> I filed a backport issue
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8251270
>
> and corresponding CSR
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8251270
>
> and assigned them to Zhengyu.
>
> On 8/6/20, 1:50 PM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Hohensee, Paul" <jdk8u-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net on behalf of hohensee at amazon.com> wrote:
>
> +1 on needing a CSR for the backport. I'd missed the CSR link because it was buried under "Show 5 more links".
>
> I posted an RFO (Request for Opinion) on the same topic of approving strictly additive CSRs for backport.
>
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2020-August/012319.html
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
> On 8/6/20, 8:02 AM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Severin Gehwolf" <jdk8u-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net on behalf of sgehwolf at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 10:13 -0400, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
> > > The original patch required a CSR[1], so we should file one for JDK 8u
> > > too. I wonder where the CSR is for Oracle JDK 8, though.
> >
> > It does not seem to have a CSR for 11u backport(?) Do 8u need one?
>
> Right. I don't know about what happened there for Oracle JDK. You could
> try to ask.
>
> I believe we need one since this is changing the 8 SE API by adding:
>
> javax/naming/ldap/spi/LdapDnsProvider.java
> javax/naming/ldap/spi/LdapDnsProviderResult.java
>
> Thanks,
> Severin
>
>
>
More information about the jdk8u-dev
mailing list