[8u] RFR(m): 8194298: Add support for per Socket configuration of TCP keepalive

[Andrew Haley]

On 29/06/2020 17:06, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> It's a possibility. IMHO, it doesn't really make the code easier to
> read, though. Some duplication for clarity seems OK to me in this case.
> I'm not too fond of over-use of ifdef so I'd rather keep it at v5.
> YMMV.

OK.

-- 
Andrew Haley  (he/him)
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
https://keybase.io/andrewhaley
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671