[8u] RFR: 8146215: (fs) java/nio/file/Files/probeContentType/Basic.java failed frequently on Solaris-sparc with Unexpected type: text/plain
Alex Kashchenko
akashche at redhat.com
Tue Jun 30 12:19:41 UTC 2020
On 06/29/2020 01:47 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> On 26/06/2020 23:30, Alex Kashchenko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review the backport of JDK-8146215 to 8u:
>>
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146215
>>
>> 9 commit: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/44bb7c7997ca
>>
>> 8u webrev: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akasko/jdk8u/8146215/webrev.00/
>>
>> 8u code change is almost identical to 9, only copyright year is changed
>> in AbstractFileTypeDetector.java. Test part doesn't apply cleanly,
>> because probeContentType/Basic.java in 9 contains changes that are not
>> in 8u (JDK-8129632 and others), it is adjusted for 8u. Testing: included
>> test, jck:api/java_net;api/java_nio.
>>
>>
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> The class library code changes look fine.
>
> For the testing, I think JDK-8150204 should at least be backported
> first. It's a test-only change, and you're effectively doing that in
> this patch, but uncredited. I can understand the reluctance to backport
> the Mac OS X fix, JDK-8129632, so I'm happy for the 8150204 backport to
> just take the testing changes from 8129632 as part of it, or work around
> them as you have here.
>
> Once 8150204 is in place, this backport should be close to the 11u version.
Thanks for your comments! I've posted 8150204 for review:
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2020-June/012063.html
--
-Alex
More information about the jdk8u-dev
mailing list