[8u] RFR Backport JDK-8154313, Generated javadoc scattered all over the place

Jiri Vanek jvanek at redhat.com
Thu May 21 06:43:42 UTC 2020


ping

please do not let it rot!
On 5/19/20 2:32 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> On 5/19/20 9:44 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>> On 5/19/20 3:24 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18/05/2020 15:03, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>>> hi!
>>>>
>>>> This is third, hopefully last, reincarnation of this backport.
>>>> Refreshed - http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jvanek/8154313/ - as it was approved last time.
>>>> It is  jdk11-like version of the patch.
>>>>
>>>> However after above was agreed, an issue concerning backport of
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168772 (
>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/rev/db49e4e492e0 ), which is quite huge was raised.
>>>>
>>>> If there is no intention to backport 8168772  ever, then my current patch is good to go. If not,
>>>> then the 8154313 (http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/rev/ec69c5bf68a6) should be applied as it was
>>>> commited, but 8168772 have to follow after it.
>>>> I do not feel exactly voulenteered ino backporting of 8168772
>>>>
>>>> Thanx!
>>>>   J.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for looking into this again.
>>>
>>> I'll have a look at the feasibility of JDK-8168772 and get back to you.
>>>
>>> I'm tending towards just applying this as previously reviewed, but it
>>> may be that JDK-8168772, though long, applies nearly cleanly and it's
>>> preferable to have 8u & 11u working the same.
>>
>> Ok. Will try that too. Thanx!
> Afer applying 8154313 as jdk8 as possible, applying 8168772:
> 
> atching file common/autoconf/generated-configure.sh
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 5093.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file common/autoconf/generated-configure.sh.rej
> patching file common/autoconf/spec.gmk.in
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 265.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 788.
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file common/autoconf/spec.gmk.in.rej
> patching file make/Javadoc.gmk
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 22.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 171.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 355.
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 1742.
> 4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file make/Javadoc.gmk.rej
> patching file make/Main.gmk
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 341.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 683.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 812.
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 860.
> Hunk #5 FAILED at 872.
> Hunk #6 FAILED at 911.
> 6 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file make/Main.gmk.rej
> can't find file to patch at input line 2731
> Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
> The text leading up to this was:
> --------------------------
> |diff -r f37e46c2e8f6 -r db49e4e492e0 make/MainSupport.gmk
> |--- a/make/MainSupport.gmk	Wed Oct 26 09:44:20 2016 +0200
> |+++ b/make/MainSupport.gmk	Wed Oct 26 16:00:26 2016 +0200
> --------------------------
> File to patch:
> Skip this patch? [y] y
> Skipping patch.
> 2 out of 2 hunks ignored
> 
> 
> That backport moreover means to rewrite it.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jvanek at redhat.com    M: +420775390109



More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list