RFR (S): 8056911: Remove internal API usage from ExtendedRobot class

[Hohensee, Paul]

The first patch required context changes, so I though it needed review. The second goes along with it, so I included it for completeness.

Thanks,
Paul

On 10/30/20, 1:12 PM, "Andrew Hughes" <gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:

    On 16:38 Fri 30 Oct     , Hohensee, Paul wrote:
    > This is actually a pair of backports. After 8056911, 8062606 was needed to fix 8056911.
    > 
    > This pair was pushed to IcedTea, see http://icedtea.classpath.org//hg/icedtea8-forest/jdk?cmd=changeset;node=96efd35f030e<http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea8-forest/jdk?cmd=changeset;node=96efd35f030e>.
    > 
    > JBS issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8056911
    > Original patch: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/c6b695f708f1
    > 8u webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8056911/webrev.8u.jdk.00/
    > 
    > The patch applied cleanly net of file location and context.
    > 
    > JBS issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8062606
    > Original patch: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/7afec3ed5ab5
    > 8u webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8062606/webrev.8u.jdk.00/
    > 
    > The patch applied cleanly after 8056911.
    > 
    > Thanks,
    > Paul
    > 

    Is there a reason not to just flag these with jdk8u-fix-request?
    Private bugs, perhaps?

    Thanks,
    -- 
    Andrew :)

    Senior Free Java Software Engineer
    OpenJDK Package Owner
    Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

    PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
    Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222