[8u] RFR: 8256818: SSLSocket that is never bound or connected leaks socket resources

[Alex Kashchenko]

On 4/22/21, Hohensee, Paul <hohensee at amazon.com> wrote:
> You're correct, there's no overlap. Looks fine.

Thanks for the review!

>
> 11u contains 3 separate follow-up backports, so it would be best to do the
> same for 8u.

Posted these three backports for review:

https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2021-April/013712.html
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2021-April/013713.html
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2021-April/013714.html


>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Kashchenko <akashche at redhat.com>
> Date: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 at 12:57 PM
> To: "Hohensee, Paul" <hohensee at amazon.com>
> Cc: "jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net" <jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: RE: [8u] RFR: 8256818: SSLSocket that is never bound or connected
> leaks socket resources
>
> Hi,
>
> On 4/15/21, Alex Kashchenko <akashche at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 4/15/21, Hohensee, Paul <hohensee at amazon.com> wrote:
>>> This patch needs updating. E.g., the IOException catch code in
>>> SocketImpl.java is already in 8u.
>>
>> Thanks for your comments! I will revisit the patch and prepare the
>> updated version shortly.
>
> I've re-checked that the patch can be applied to the latest 8u-dev, it
> appeared that recent IOException changes do not overlap with it.
>
> In mainline this patch required 3 follow-up commits with minor fixes
> to the test. I've combined these patches into one 8u backport and
> posted it for review here:
>
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2021-April/013678.html
>
> I think it will make sense to push this backport together with the
> follow-up one.
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Paul
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: jdk8u-dev <jdk8u-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net> on behalf of Alex
>>> Kashchenko <akashche at redhat.com>
>>> Date: Monday, January 4, 2021 at 2:11 PM
>>> To: "jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net" <jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net>
>>> Subject: [8u] RFR: 8256818: SSLSocket that is never bound or connected
>>> leaks
>>> socket resources
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please review the backport of JDK-8256818 to 8u:
>>>
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8256818
>>>
>>> Original change: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/93b6ab56
>>>
>>> 11u change:
>>> https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk11u-dev/rev/8f9ce4460636
>>>
>>> Some details on current 11u behaviour (also applicable to 8u):
>>> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2020-December/004507.html
>>>
>>> 8u webrev: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akasko/jdk8u/8256818/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> Code change to SSLSocketImpl.java applies cleanly after path change.
>>> SSLSocketLeak.java test needs to be adapted for 8u: to get the number
>>> of process handles on Windows native lib is required; there is no
>>> support for building native test libs in 8u, because of this
>>> libFileUtils.c is placed into the same directory where test is; test
>>> is marked as "manual" and "native" and comment with details about
>>> shared lib is added to the test; test is adapted to load shared lib
>>> directly without going through FileUtils; changes to CheckHandles.java
>>> are not applicable to 8u, because corresponding change JDK-8239893 is
>>> not in 8u.
>>>
>>> Testing: checked that added test passes on Linux and Windows, ran
>>> jtreg:jdk/sun/security/ssl/ and jck:api/javax_net/ssl .
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Alex
>>
>
>
> --
> -Alex
>
>
>


-- 
-Alex