[8u] RFR bad source/target in Makefile of J2DBench

Jiri Vanek jvanek at redhat.com
Mon Oct 25 18:14:46 UTC 2021


Thanx!

webrev adapted: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jvanek/bad_j2d_bytecodeversion/webrev/

Compared to original, I had dropepd the build.xml change, as it was not relevant.

The https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042199 is already closed.  Should it be reopened, or new bug will be created?

Thanx!
  J.



On 10/25/21 15:37, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> On 18:56 Thu 21 Oct     , Jiri Vanek wrote:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jvanek/bad_j2d_bytecodeversion/
>>
>> Hello! the build.xml (https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/file/d2bbff5b7006/src/share/demo/java2d/J2DBench/build.xml#l52) is corerect,
>> and have -source/target correctly on 1.5
>>
>> However Mkaefile was left behind, and is on 1.2, which jdk8 itself can not play.
>>
>>
>> Am looking forward for kind soul to create a bug a commit on my behalf.
>>
>> Happy hacking,
>>      J.
>> -- 
>> Jiri Vanek Mgr.
>> Principal QA Software Engineer
>> Red Hat Inc.
>> +420 775 39 01 09
>>
> 
> This looks like a subset of:
> 
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042199
> 
> I think it would be preferable to backport this to keep this code aligned
> across JDKs. It fixes some other differences between the Makefile &
> build.xml, as well as actually making it buildable with 1.4, as the
> README claims.
> 
> The -g:none addition seemed strange to me, but it seems debug=false
> has been in build.xml since the start of the OpenJDK project [0].
> If we want to remove that, we should probably do so in HEAD and
> backport for consistency across releases.
> 
> [0] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2014-August/004736.html
> 

-- 
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775 39 01 09



More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list