[8u] RFR bad source/target in Makefile of J2DBench
Jiri Vanek
jvanek at redhat.com
Mon Oct 25 18:14:46 UTC 2021
Thanx!
webrev adapted: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jvanek/bad_j2d_bytecodeversion/webrev/
Compared to original, I had dropepd the build.xml change, as it was not relevant.
The https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042199 is already closed. Should it be reopened, or new bug will be created?
Thanx!
J.
On 10/25/21 15:37, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> On 18:56 Thu 21 Oct , Jiri Vanek wrote:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jvanek/bad_j2d_bytecodeversion/
>>
>> Hello! the build.xml (https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk/file/d2bbff5b7006/src/share/demo/java2d/J2DBench/build.xml#l52) is corerect,
>> and have -source/target correctly on 1.5
>>
>> However Mkaefile was left behind, and is on 1.2, which jdk8 itself can not play.
>>
>>
>> Am looking forward for kind soul to create a bug a commit on my behalf.
>>
>> Happy hacking,
>> J.
>> --
>> Jiri Vanek Mgr.
>> Principal QA Software Engineer
>> Red Hat Inc.
>> +420 775 39 01 09
>>
>
> This looks like a subset of:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042199
>
> I think it would be preferable to backport this to keep this code aligned
> across JDKs. It fixes some other differences between the Makefile &
> build.xml, as well as actually making it buildable with 1.4, as the
> README claims.
>
> The -g:none addition seemed strange to me, but it seems debug=false
> has been in build.xml since the start of the OpenJDK project [0].
> If we want to remove that, we should probably do so in HEAD and
> backport for consistency across releases.
>
> [0] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2014-August/004736.html
>
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775 39 01 09
More information about the jdk8u-dev
mailing list