[jdk8u-dev] RFR: 8214046: [macosx] Undecorated Frame does not Iconify when set to [v2]

[Tobias Gesellchen]

On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 18:03:04 GMT, Tobias Gesellchen <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> See https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8214046 with the original patch at https://hg.openjdk.org/jdk/jdk/rev/769dbf384c44. I used https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u-dev/commit/ab97f65242dad6ad1a7bfb8284954f202eb37369 as backport commit.
>
> Tobias Gesellchen has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   8214046: [macosx] Undecorated Frame does not Iconify when set to
>   
>   Reviewed-by: dmarkov
>   Backport-of: ab97f65242dad6ad1a7bfb8284954f202eb37369

Here is the promised JBS link: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313704
It's already closed - thanks @mrserb.

According to https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313704?focusedCommentId=14601715&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-14601715 the fix is already backported to 8u261 (via https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8241728), and I'd like to add that 8u271 should also have the backport (via https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8248969).
Yet, I don't know why the fix isn't part of the main branch of [openjdk/jdk8u-dev](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u-dev). I'm curious if there's a specfic reason or if the commit simply slipped through. Is `8u271` different from `openjdk8u271`?

Sorry for bothering you, I'm not sure how much happens behind the scenes, and you probably also have non-public channels. I'm only trying to understand how to apply the backport so that it will be included in future 8uXYZ releases :)

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/341#issuecomment-1667749766