[jdk8u-dev] RFR: 8250825: C2 crashes with assert(field != __null) failed: missing field [v2]

[SendaoYan]

On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 10:23:36 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky <zzambers at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The GHA report several failures:
>> 
>> 1. macos x64 `runtime/7158988/FieldMonitor.java` fails `VM initialization failed for: j2sdk-image/jre/bin/java -Xshare:off -XX:+PrintGC -Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=Mac-1721876641775.local:49199,suspend=y TestPostFieldModification`. This test also fails in [PR551](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u-dev/pull/551), I think it's unrelated to this PR.
>> 2. macos x64 `compiler/unsafe/OpaqueAccesses.java` fails `SIGSEGV  in Unsafe_GetInt`, This test also fails in [PR551](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u-dev/pull/551), I think it's unrelated to this PR.
>> 3. macos x64 all the `com/sun/jdi` testcases fails `transport error 202: gethostbyname: unknown host`, seems to be GHA environmental issue.
>
>> The GHA report several failures:
>> 
>>     1. macos x64 `runtime/7158988/FieldMonitor.java` fails `VM initialization failed for: j2sdk-image/jre/bin/java -Xshare:off -XX:+PrintGC -Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=Mac-1721876641775.local:49199,suspend=y TestPostFieldModification`. This test also fails in [PR551](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u-dev/pull/551), I think it's unrelated to this PR.
>> 
>>     2. macos x64 `compiler/unsafe/OpaqueAccesses.java` fails `SIGSEGV  in Unsafe_GetInt`, This test also fails in [PR551](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u-dev/pull/551), I think it's unrelated to this PR.
>> 
>>     3. macos x64 all the `com/sun/jdi` testcases fails `transport error 202: gethostbyname: unknown host`, seems to be GHA environmental issue.
> 
> All these mac issues should be unrelated, see: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u-dev/pull/544

> After #544 has been merged, does the two jbs issue can be cloesd? @zzambers 
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337185
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337183

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/552#issuecomment-2250192668