8u412-ga build error on loong64

[Andrew Hughes]

On 17:32 Wed 12 Jun 2024, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> 
> >Did the original version build on some platforms? I'm wondering why
> >we didn't catch this from the original fix.
> 
> I applied the original patch as sent to me by Leslie Zhai
> in Debian, and it built fine, and I found this difference
> when comparing (to see if I can drop the entire patch or
> whether I have to keep parts) on upgrading to 8u412.
> 
> bye,
> //mirabilos
> -- 
> Infrastrukturexperte • Qvest Digital AG
> Am Dickobskreuz 10, D-53121 Bonn • https://www.qvest-digital.com/
> Telephon +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235
> HRB AG Bonn 18196 • USt-ID (VAT): DE274355441
> Vorstand: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg
> Vorsitzender Aufsichtsrat: Peter Nöthen
> 

Right, so I'm wondering what happened between that patch and
the version that went into the JDK, which then needed the
JDK-8315020 follow-up.

It suggests the version that went into the JDK never actually worked.
-- 
Andrew :)
Pronouns: he / him or they / them
Principal Free Java Software Engineer
OpenJDK Package Owner
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

Please contact via e-mail, not proprietary chat networks
Available on Libera Chat & OFTC IRC networks as gnu_andrew
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/attachments/20240615/532590b0/signature.asc>