From duke at openjdk.org  Tue May  6 02:00:29 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Chuanqi Zang)
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 02:00:29 GMT
Subject: [jdk8u-dev] RFR: 8261235: C1 compilation fails with
 assert(res->vreg_number() == index) failed: conversion check [v2]
In-Reply-To: <bXohkS3oluGAKcTtc-Xv1fsKPbpLyXXW5esHx2ieGDw=.6b4d09d3-f91c-4c51-ad95-a3a4c1f849a6@github.com>
References: <zK5NXoUyh9Zy6-HpHxl1M0UXb0QBQSJ510xdFIcgdzU=.86d3438e-5748-4fb1-bb7b-002f97c86541@github.com>
 <bXohkS3oluGAKcTtc-Xv1fsKPbpLyXXW5esHx2ieGDw=.6b4d09d3-f91c-4c51-ad95-a3a4c1f849a6@github.com>
Message-ID: <UhPHNdwVMs-uZPBQE0wcyxO-ox__VkaFf3rcQBif-5o=.902337a7-b414-41ba-bb18-7b15bbcb07f2@github.com>

On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 08:00:20 GMT, Chuanqi Zang <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi all,
>> 
>> This is backport [JDK-8261235](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8261235) from jdk17 to jdk8u-dev, to fix C1 compilation failed in HugeMethods.
>> 
>> File 'hotspot/test/compiler/c1/TestTooManyVirtualRegistersMain.java'  remove  annotation '  @requires vm.compiler1.enabled
>> '
>> other file mainly in copyrighht year different.  
>> 
>> it's necessary for jdk8u-dev.
>> 
>> Change has been verified locally, we do test jdk-tier1 tier2 and hotspot-tier1 passed, no risk.
>> 
>>  [JDK-8261235](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8261235) : C1 compilation fails with assert(res->vreg_number() == index) failed: conversion check
>
> Chuanqi Zang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Fix codestyle

Kindly ping @gnu-andrew , could you please review this patch?  hagedorn just have read-only permissions.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/622#issuecomment-2853044622

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed May  7 02:17:22 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Taizo Kurashige)
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 02:17:22 GMT
Subject: [jdk8u-dev] RFR: 8026976: ECParameters,
 Point does not match field size
In-Reply-To: <fVaxmb8Ohfm-AHi3lB6ve9S-RSpgg14xyiSM3AAtcUg=.87beb911-6f89-487d-a387-d94178705090@github.com>
References: <fVaxmb8Ohfm-AHi3lB6ve9S-RSpgg14xyiSM3AAtcUg=.87beb911-6f89-487d-a387-d94178705090@github.com>
Message-ID: <dQE8YVBqWBzoftxU2MQdUPtBkd-DTKhZg1SdZMeCltE=.9c320817-674f-494e-a0cb-615a3e27cf52@github.com>

On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 11:43:49 GMT, Taizo Kurashige <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This is a backport of JDK-8026976: ECParameters, Point does not match field size
> 
> Except for the fix in the Problemlist and the one for Copyright year, original patch apply cleanly to 8u.
> 
> Testing: jdk/sun/security/pkcs11 tests on RHEL9, GHA testing
> 
> Thanks.

@jerboaa

I recognize that [JDK-8026976](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8026976) requires a maintainer approval.
You have given me a maintainer approval in https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u-dev/pull/2958.
I'm sorry to bother you, but could you approve [JDK-8026976](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8026976)?

Thanks.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/643#issuecomment-2856822299

From sgehwolf at openjdk.org  Wed May  7 08:19:25 2025
From: sgehwolf at openjdk.org (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 08:19:25 GMT
Subject: [jdk8u-dev] RFR: 8026976: ECParameters,
 Point does not match field size
In-Reply-To: <fVaxmb8Ohfm-AHi3lB6ve9S-RSpgg14xyiSM3AAtcUg=.87beb911-6f89-487d-a387-d94178705090@github.com>
References: <fVaxmb8Ohfm-AHi3lB6ve9S-RSpgg14xyiSM3AAtcUg=.87beb911-6f89-487d-a387-d94178705090@github.com>
Message-ID: <mNcmFBDpi_C8b1ALxmGJvTiBJ6rHA2RteyndLUM9h-s=.e9549336-abc8-40a4-8cd5-8e5131ca7ef5@github.com>

On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 11:43:49 GMT, Taizo Kurashige <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This is a backport of JDK-8026976: ECParameters, Point does not match field size
> 
> Except for the fix in the Problemlist and the one for Copyright year, original patch apply cleanly to 8u.
> 
> Testing: jdk/sun/security/pkcs11 tests on RHEL9, GHA testing
> 
> Thanks.

@franferrax @martinuy Could somebody of you please review this, too? Thanks!

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/643#issuecomment-2857544664

From mbalao at openjdk.org  Thu May  8 00:21:55 2025
From: mbalao at openjdk.org (Martin Balao)
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 00:21:55 GMT
Subject: [jdk8u-dev] RFR: 8026976: ECParameters,
 Point does not match field size
In-Reply-To: <fVaxmb8Ohfm-AHi3lB6ve9S-RSpgg14xyiSM3AAtcUg=.87beb911-6f89-487d-a387-d94178705090@github.com>
References: <fVaxmb8Ohfm-AHi3lB6ve9S-RSpgg14xyiSM3AAtcUg=.87beb911-6f89-487d-a387-d94178705090@github.com>
Message-ID: <JTIbs2sDfC0Qo4mkDxdXOlHcPZqyQ-vi2xmcK96Puvw=.e909cde7-b78e-4fc4-8da1-659850aa6831@github.com>

On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 11:43:49 GMT, Taizo Kurashige <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This is a backport of JDK-8026976: ECParameters, Point does not match field size
> 
> Except for the fix in the Problemlist and the one for Copyright year, original patch apply cleanly to 8u.
> 
> Testing: jdk/sun/security/pkcs11 tests on RHEL9, GHA testing
> 
> Thanks.

Looks good to me. Thanks for contributing this backport.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by mbalao (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/643#pullrequestreview-2823529614

From duke at openjdk.org  Thu May  8 01:51:20 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Taizo Kurashige)
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 01:51:20 GMT
Subject: [jdk8u-dev] RFR: 8026976: ECParameters,
 Point does not match field size [v2]
In-Reply-To: <fVaxmb8Ohfm-AHi3lB6ve9S-RSpgg14xyiSM3AAtcUg=.87beb911-6f89-487d-a387-d94178705090@github.com>
References: <fVaxmb8Ohfm-AHi3lB6ve9S-RSpgg14xyiSM3AAtcUg=.87beb911-6f89-487d-a387-d94178705090@github.com>
Message-ID: <2fvcJe55UT0myMh4QKjMQzxqBmLymlp3wtq1wucmdZc=.c092ffb0-17b6-4219-888c-bc8fd072318a@github.com>

> Hi all,
> 
> This is a backport of JDK-8026976: ECParameters, Point does not match field size
> 
> Except for the fix in the Problemlist and the one for Copyright year, original patch apply cleanly to 8u.
> 
> Testing: jdk/sun/security/pkcs11 tests on RHEL9, GHA testing
> 
> Thanks.

Taizo Kurashige has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8026976
 - Fix copyright year
 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8026976
 - Backport 55f5542ca2104df91e14693534cc7b3c36e81953

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/643/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/643/files/17049521..d3670746

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk8u-dev&pr=643&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk8u-dev&pr=643&range=00-01

  Stats: 315 lines in 16 files changed: 226 ins; 25 del; 64 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/643.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/643/head:pull/643

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/643

From duke at openjdk.org  Thu May  8 09:32:54 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Taizo Kurashige)
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 09:32:54 GMT
Subject: [jdk8u-dev] RFR: 8026976: ECParameters,
 Point does not match field size [v2]
In-Reply-To: <2fvcJe55UT0myMh4QKjMQzxqBmLymlp3wtq1wucmdZc=.c092ffb0-17b6-4219-888c-bc8fd072318a@github.com>
References: <fVaxmb8Ohfm-AHi3lB6ve9S-RSpgg14xyiSM3AAtcUg=.87beb911-6f89-487d-a387-d94178705090@github.com>
 <2fvcJe55UT0myMh4QKjMQzxqBmLymlp3wtq1wucmdZc=.c092ffb0-17b6-4219-888c-bc8fd072318a@github.com>
Message-ID: <AaU7PdM7ktBw0CEe4dmXjDSpcRuxlU6hEY2qQjNtibA=.e29e6d8d-99e9-4210-a214-23efb631cbbf@github.com>

On Thu, 8 May 2025 01:51:20 GMT, Taizo Kurashige <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi all,
>> 
>> This is a backport of JDK-8026976: ECParameters, Point does not match field size
>> 
>> Except for the fix in the Problemlist and the one for Copyright year, original patch apply cleanly to 8u.
>> 
>> Testing: jdk/sun/security/pkcs11 tests on RHEL9, GHA testing
>> 
>> Thanks.
>
> Taizo Kurashige has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8026976
>  - Fix copyright year
>  - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8026976
>  - Backport 55f5542ca2104df91e14693534cc7b3c36e81953

Thank you for your review.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/643#issuecomment-2862390159

From duke at openjdk.org  Thu May  8 09:32:55 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 09:32:55 GMT
Subject: [jdk8u-dev] RFR: 8026976: ECParameters,
 Point does not match field size [v2]
In-Reply-To: <2fvcJe55UT0myMh4QKjMQzxqBmLymlp3wtq1wucmdZc=.c092ffb0-17b6-4219-888c-bc8fd072318a@github.com>
References: <fVaxmb8Ohfm-AHi3lB6ve9S-RSpgg14xyiSM3AAtcUg=.87beb911-6f89-487d-a387-d94178705090@github.com>
 <2fvcJe55UT0myMh4QKjMQzxqBmLymlp3wtq1wucmdZc=.c092ffb0-17b6-4219-888c-bc8fd072318a@github.com>
Message-ID: <tQs4wmoX_gSf4X9PU4Ky8er8yfUC8sIstz_8MlM6e4Q=.e4a69fb1-cc17-43eb-8311-34dbb60c4ee0@github.com>

On Thu, 8 May 2025 01:51:20 GMT, Taizo Kurashige <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi all,
>> 
>> This is a backport of JDK-8026976: ECParameters, Point does not match field size
>> 
>> Except for the fix in the Problemlist and the one for Copyright year, original patch apply cleanly to 8u.
>> 
>> Testing: jdk/sun/security/pkcs11 tests on RHEL9, GHA testing
>> 
>> Thanks.
>
> Taizo Kurashige has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8026976
>  - Fix copyright year
>  - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8026976
>  - Backport 55f5542ca2104df91e14693534cc7b3c36e81953

@kurashige23 
Your change (at version d36707465d079d85dfe254187efe0778e05cbb06) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/643#issuecomment-2862391630

From duke at openjdk.org  Thu May  8 09:34:58 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Taizo Kurashige)
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 09:34:58 GMT
Subject: [jdk8u-dev] RFR: 8351624: [8u] Xerces-J version wrong in
 THIRD_PARTY_README after JDK-7150324
In-Reply-To: <wmsPcnWLy34WIudvBXy5G6pGhhoaPGHGZZfDsvgIGNo=.20f34a4b-b8ff-48cf-8bfa-21eda4bf7e6e@github.com>
References: <wmsPcnWLy34WIudvBXy5G6pGhhoaPGHGZZfDsvgIGNo=.20f34a4b-b8ff-48cf-8bfa-21eda4bf7e6e@github.com>
Message-ID: <znXtjzJRYgPBBWWPyL6RTz76GRm6IZhA5eb4piO1Qh8=.df906824-ed42-4a7a-b9af-38acf1ac75b0@github.com>

On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:12:22 GMT, Taizo Kurashige <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This PR fixes the wrong version of Xerces-J.
> The version of Xerces-J became 2.7.1 in JDK-7150324, but it is 2.10.0 in THIRD_PARTY_README.
> Just fix THIRD_PARTY_README, no risk.
> 
> Thanks

Could anyone review this PR please?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/636#issuecomment-2862397537

From duke at openjdk.org  Thu May  8 10:10:07 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Taizo Kurashige)
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 10:10:07 GMT
Subject: [jdk8u-dev] Integrated: 8026976: ECParameters,
 Point does not match field size
In-Reply-To: <fVaxmb8Ohfm-AHi3lB6ve9S-RSpgg14xyiSM3AAtcUg=.87beb911-6f89-487d-a387-d94178705090@github.com>
References: <fVaxmb8Ohfm-AHi3lB6ve9S-RSpgg14xyiSM3AAtcUg=.87beb911-6f89-487d-a387-d94178705090@github.com>
Message-ID: <VRMDWKEAWQptc8Y1O6-p0Uow5nahVgjzdzGUr-kQ_bg=.755bea3b-ca7c-4992-bfe4-b3eed2f28d33@github.com>

On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 11:43:49 GMT, Taizo Kurashige <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This is a backport of JDK-8026976: ECParameters, Point does not match field size
> 
> Except for the fix in the Problemlist and the one for Copyright year, original patch apply cleanly to 8u.
> 
> Testing: jdk/sun/security/pkcs11 tests on RHEL9, GHA testing
> 
> Thanks.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 5e59411b
Author:    Taizo Kurashige <103394724+kurashige23 at users.noreply.github.com>
Committer: Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/commit/5e59411bd3760a4c54bd52d301d882e4a9f5aab4
Stats:     9 lines in 2 files changed: 6 ins; 2 del; 1 mod

8026976: ECParameters, Point does not match field size

Reviewed-by: phh, mbalao
Backport-of: 55f5542ca2104df91e14693534cc7b3c36e81953

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/643

From roland at openjdk.org  Fri May  9 08:04:31 2025
From: roland at openjdk.org (Roland Westrelin)
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 08:04:31 GMT
Subject: [jdk8u-dev] RFR: 8071996: split_if accesses NULL region of
 ConstraintCast
Message-ID: <5zXbHoMxL5zXExguRHivVrg3LCQIAgCtx0PaeShIPZU=.01334d4c-405a-402d-99ca-d0d94e06017c@github.com>

Applies cleanly. Tested with tier1.

A customer reported a crash that's likely this bug. The fix is low risk. I propose we backport it.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport d4d8ef4585c1c6192fe35524faa6c6961d1e7a64

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/649/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk8u-dev&pr=649&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8071996
  Stats: 12 lines in 1 file changed: 8 ins; 0 del; 4 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/649.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/649/head:pull/649

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/649

From roland at openjdk.org  Fri May  9 12:44:59 2025
From: roland at openjdk.org (Roland Westrelin)
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 12:44:59 GMT
Subject: [jdk8u-dev] RFR: 8071996: split_if accesses NULL region of
 ConstraintCast
In-Reply-To: <5zXbHoMxL5zXExguRHivVrg3LCQIAgCtx0PaeShIPZU=.01334d4c-405a-402d-99ca-d0d94e06017c@github.com>
References: <5zXbHoMxL5zXExguRHivVrg3LCQIAgCtx0PaeShIPZU=.01334d4c-405a-402d-99ca-d0d94e06017c@github.com>
Message-ID: <6e3-Ioq7JXNnudjB8ief0u1ZGK-VfppjXid_ornwacI=.1fafb9a6-9722-4026-8f57-b95f7c948b9b@github.com>

On Fri, 9 May 2025 08:00:03 GMT, Roland Westrelin <roland at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Applies cleanly. Tested with tier1.
> 
> A customer reported a crash that's likely this bug. The fix is low risk. I propose we backport it.

Test failures appear unrelated to this change.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/649#issuecomment-2866400401

From duke at openjdk.org  Fri May  9 15:17:12 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Antonio Vieiro)
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 15:17:12 GMT
Subject: [jdk8u-dev] RFR: 8303770: Remove Baltimore root certificate expiring
 in May 2025
Message-ID: <mvUPAoFvRw8NU_97_Q4enLtS2PGjJ8ZgP3L0o8etf-o=.3d1f4b29-e292-4dbb-986f-1f211cddb036@github.com>

Backport of [JDK-8303770](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8303770) from 11.  Mostly clean (certfile location differs from 11).

Test `jdk/test/sun/security/lib/cacerts/VerifyCACerts.java` passes on `RHEL8, x86_64, gcc8.5.0`.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport c0e7aa6c122e88e0d749ac3e8edf2cda9c5f53da

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/650/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk8u-dev&pr=650&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8303770
  Stats: 34 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 30 del; 4 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/650.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/650/head:pull/650

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/650

From serb at openjdk.org  Fri May  9 19:20:02 2025
From: serb at openjdk.org (Sergey Bylokhov)
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 19:20:02 GMT
Subject: [jdk8u-dev] RFR: 8345358: Some DLL Files are missing Windows
 Properties
In-Reply-To: <koeEr_e04epHqgXUwkf8bbeihs2ZGca1-NfOiDODuPg=.bb667f9f-7ac6-47a1-84b1-8f558e6dc113@github.com>
References: <koeEr_e04epHqgXUwkf8bbeihs2ZGca1-NfOiDODuPg=.bb667f9f-7ac6-47a1-84b1-8f558e6dc113@github.com>
Message-ID: <yEWPDSNjEG2ma81spfF-zpSqhy3gWhT29FOQSDzfHnQ=.89169a8f-09d1-4665-9deb-523ed8a50320@github.com>

On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 22:45:15 GMT, Alexey Bakhtin <abakhtin at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Add missing properties for the j2gss.dll and sspi_bridge.dll files

keep open

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/611#issuecomment-2867667776

From hohensee at amazon.com  Sat May 10 02:26:28 2025
From: hohensee at amazon.com (Hohensee, Paul)
Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 02:26:28 +0000
Subject: Result: New JDK 8 Updates Reviewer: Roman Kennke
Message-ID: <12E4CAF5-E8D2-494C-A798-0B4B2EB3BC85@amazon.com>

Voting [1] for Roman Kennke [2] is now closed.

Yes: 8
No: 0
Abstain: 0

According to the Bylaws definition of Three Vote Consensus [3], this is sufficient to approve the nomination.

Thanks,
Paul

[1] https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2025-April/019998.html
[2] https://openjdk.org/census#rkennke
[3] https://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#three-vote-consensus


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/attachments/20250510/15a4cd1e/attachment-0001.htm>