[jdk8u-dev] RFR: 8297088: Update LCMS to 2.14 [v2]

[Andrew John Hughes]

On Mon, 1 Sep 2025 13:07:32 GMT, Ekaterina Vergizova <evergizova at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I'd like to backport it for parity with Oracle 8u.
>> 11u patch applies almost cleanly, except for a license update in THIRD_PARTY_README instead of lcms.md.
>> I also fixed the file paths in UPDATING.txt instructions so that they match the paths in OpenJDK8.
>> 
>> GHA testing revealed no regressions, additionally tested manually with J2Ddemo.
>
> Ekaterina Vergizova has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'master' into 8297088
>  - Backport 01b213899cb8124860441fa26c9652b4a4bff896

Issues with Windows build resolved.

> > Patch itself looks ok. Could you re-run the Windows x86_64 build? It seems to be failing in an odd way (failing to build FreeType) that I can't see is related to the change.
> 
> @gnu-andrew, thanks for the review. It looks like the problem with Windows builds were fixed by [41e6bf7](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u-dev/commit/41e6bf7d1f6a0b576c46c1f00e2c4cbc89a48a96)
> 
> All builds have passed successfully after the merge, and the remaining test failures don't seem to be related to the backport:
> 
>     * security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CAInterop.java#actalisauthenticationrootca
> 
>     * gc/concurrentMarkSweep/SystemGCOnForegroundCollector.java
> 
>     * runtime/7158988/FieldMonitor.java

Thanks for re-testing. It's good to hear that this fixed the build as the relationship between the two wasn't clear from the build failure.

8u482 is open now, so please apply for approval to get this in.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by andrew (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/677#pullrequestreview-3181305840
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/677#issuecomment-3249837571