RFR [9] Modular Source Code
harold seigel
harold.seigel at oracle.com
Fri Aug 15 16:14:00 UTC 2014
Hi Chris,
Could you change the comment at the start of expand_entries_to_path in
src/share/vm/runtime/os.cpp to:
// returns a PATH of all entries in the given directory *that do not
start with a '.'*
Thanks, Harold
On 8/13/2014 8:17 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
>> On 2014-08-12 16:10, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>> This is a review request for the Initial changes for JEP 201: Modular
>>> Source Code [1].
>>>
>>> There are a number of individuals responsible for these changes. Some,
>>> possibly not all, are explicitly listed in the To section of this
>>> mail, and they will help address any comments arising from this review
>>> request.
>>>
>>> For the purposes of review, the actual source file moves have been
>>> omitted from the webrev below, with the exception of any source file
>>> that has a change to it’s actual content. The new location of the
>>> source files can be determined from JEP 201 [1] and JEP 200 "The
>>> Modular JDK" [2], or by browsing the staging forest [3].
>>>
>>> Webrevs:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8054834/00/
>>>
>>> Due to the significant impact of these changes, a JDK 9 promotion has
>>> been tentatively reserved for their integration. All comments are
>>> welcome, although given the nature of the changes then we might have
>>> to create separate issues in JIRA to address some of them later in
>>> jdk9/dev..
>>>
>>> -Chris.
>>>
>>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051619
>>> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051618
>>> [3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/stage
>>
More information about the jdk9-dev
mailing list