RFR [JEP 220] Modular Run-Time Images - fix zero build

Erik Joelsson erik.joelsson at oracle.com
Wed Dec 3 14:30:16 UTC 2014


Hello Xerxes,

Thanks for the suggestion. I have created 
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066589 to track this issue. 
Unfortunately we won't have time to fix it before pushing JEP 220 to 
jdk9. I hope this won't inconvenience you too much.

Your suggested patch does correctly highlight the problem areas, but 
will not work since gnu make does not accept shell logic outside of 
recipes or $(shell ...) constructs.

/Erik

On 2014-12-03 14:37, Xerxes Rånby wrote:
> Hi Chris!
>
> The build changes introduced a new dependency that sa-jdi.jar is 
> always built.
>
> The sa-jdi.jar do not get built  for Zero and Itanium builds.
> Zero is built using the --with-jvm-interpreter=cpp 
> --with-jvm-variants=zero configure options.
>
> The sa-jdi.jar also do not exist if you use the --with-import-hotspot= 
> to import alternative OpenJDK JVM such as
> a pre-compiled CACAO JVM or JamVM libjvm.so .
>
> I would suggest to change the jdk/make/Import.gmk and 
> jdk/make/gensrc/Gensrc-jdk.jdi.gmk to first check if sa-jdi.jar
> exist before adding it to the SA_TARGETS and GENSRC_JDK_JDI something 
> like this:
>
> Index: openjdk-jdk9-b38/jdk/make/Import.gmk
> ===================================================================
> --- openjdk-jdk9-b38.orig/jdk/make/Import.gmk   2014-11-17 
> 17:34:13.830175424 +0100
> +++ openjdk-jdk9-b38/jdk/make/Import.gmk        2014-11-18 
> 09:10:25.420715300 +0100
> @@ -221,6 +221,8 @@
>  # even if zip is already unpacked.
>  $(SUPPORT_OUTPUTDIR)/gensrc/jdk.hotspot.agent/_the.sa.services: 
> $(HOTSPOT_DIST)/lib/sa-jdi.jar
>
> +# sa-jdi.jar do not exist for Itanium and zero
> +if [ -a $(HOTSPOT_DIST)/lib/sa-jdi.jar ] ; \
>  SA_TARGETS += 
> $(JDK_OUTPUTDIR)/modules/jdk.hotspot.agent/_the.sa.jar.unpacked \
> $(SUPPORT_OUTPUTDIR)/gensrc/jdk.hotspot.agent/_the.sa.services
>
> Index: openjdk-jdk9-b38/jdk/make/gensrc/Gensrc-jdk.jdi.gmk
> ===================================================================
> --- openjdk-jdk9-b38.orig/jdk/make/gensrc/Gensrc-jdk.jdi.gmk 
> 2014-11-18 08:57:26.504852865 +0100
> +++ openjdk-jdk9-b38/jdk/make/gensrc/Gensrc-jdk.jdi.gmk 2014-11-18 
> 09:10:43.348804201 +0100
> @@ -78,12 +78,10 @@
> $(SUPPORT_OUTPUTDIR)/gensrc/jdk.jdi/META-INF/services/com.sun.jdi.connect.Connector
>         $(install-file)
>
> +# sa-jdi.jar do not exist for Itanium and zero
> +if [ -a $(HOTSPOT_DIST)/lib/sa-jdi.jar ] ; \
>  GENSRC_JDK_JDI += 
> $(SUPPORT_OUTPUTDIR)/gensrc/jdk.jdi/META-INF/services/com.sun.jdi.connect.Connector 
> \
> $(JDK_OUTPUTDIR)/modules/jdk.hotspot.agent/META-INF/services/com.sun.jdi.connect.Connector
>
>
> Cheers
> Xerxes
>
>
>
>>> From: Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>
>>> Subject: RFR [JEP 220] Modular Run-Time Images
>>> Date: 20 November 2014 21:39:14 GMT
>>> To: jigsaw-dev <jigsaw-dev at openjdk.java.net>, jdk9-dev 
>>> <jdk9-dev at openjdk.java.net>, build-dev <build-dev at openjdk.java.net>, 
>>> Alan Bateman <alan.bateman at oracle.com>, Alex Buckley 
>>> <alex.buckley at oracle.com>, Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>, 
>>> Erik Joelsson <erik.joelsson at oracle.com>, Jonathan Gibbons 
>>> <jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com>, Karen Kinnear 
>>> <karen.kinnear at oracle.com>, "Jim Laskey (Oracle)" 
>>> <James.Laskey at oracle.com>, Magnus Ihse Bursie 
>>> <magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com>, Mandy Chung 
>>> <mandy.chung at oracle.com>, Mark Reinhold <mark.reinhold at oracle.com>, 
>>> Paul Sandoz <paul.sandoz at oracle.com>, "A. Sundararajan" 
>>> <sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com>
>>>
>>> This is a review request for the changes for JEP 220: Modular 
>>> Run-Time Images [1].
>>>
>>> There are a number of individuals responsible for these changes. 
>>> Some, possibly not all, are explicitly listed in the 'To' section of 
>>> this mail, and they will help address any comments arising from this 
>>> review request.
>>>
>>> The new run-time image structure is defined in JEP 220 [1], and can 
>>> be seen as a result of building the staging forest [2], or in the 
>>> early access builds [3].
>>>
>>> Webrevs:
>>>    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8061971/00/
>>>
>>> Due to the significant impact of these changes, a JDK 9 promotion 
>>> has been tentatively reserved for their integration. All comments 
>>> are welcome, although given the nature of the changes then we might 
>>> have to create separate issues in JIRA to address some of them later 
>>> in jdk9/dev.
>>>
>>> -Chris.
>>>
>>> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/220
>>> [2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/m2/
>>> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/ea
>



More information about the jdk9-dev mailing list