[9] RFR(S): 8066433: Copy Whitebox testlibrary to top level repository

Staffan Larsen staffan.larsen at oracle.com
Tue Dec 9 10:00:12 UTC 2014


+1

> On 9 dec 2014, at 10:56, Stefan Sarne <stefan.sarne at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 2014-12-09 10:51, Tobias Hartmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> thanks for the feedback.
>> 
>> On 08.12.2014 20:46, Staffan Larsen wrote:
>>>> On 8 dec 2014, at 20:18, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 2014/12/8 2:19 -0800, stefan.sarne at oracle.com:
>>>>> ...
>>>>> 
>>>>> This would also be a good place to discuss the structure of the test
>>>>> library.
>>>> Yes.  The various "testlibrary" directories in different repos are, at
>>>> the moment, a bit of a mess and in some cases appear to be redundant.
>>>> 
>>>> For the present root-repo proposal:
>>>> 
>>>>  - Why is it named test/testlibrary rather than test/lib, which is
>>>>    what's used in the jdk repo?
>>> Probably because it’s called test/testlibrary in the hotspot repo :-)
>> Yes, do you prefer 'test/lib'?
> 
> Now sounds like a good time to align.   :)
> We can update testlibrary in hotspot to the same as well I think (as a second step).
> Let's go with test/lib.
> 
>> 
>>>>  - Why does the white-box library get its own directory?  Shouldn't
>>>>    all test-library classes have the same package root?
>>> +1
>> I agree. I'll remove the whitebox directory.
> 
> Sounds good, the same package root is better.
> 
>> 
>>>>  - The package name "sun.hotspot" is archaic.  We should figure out a
>>>>    proper naming scheme for test-library packages, preferably starting
>>>>    with "jdk.”.
>>> So jdk.testlibrary.whitebox.* for these? Or jdk.testlib.whitebox?
>> Whatever you prefer.
> 
> If we go with test/lib - I think jdk.testlib make sense.
> 
> Thanks
> Stefan
> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tobias
>> 
>>>>> ...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Based on the discussion around microbenchmarks, it may make sense to
>>>>> break out the test folder to a separate repo if it starts growing.
>>>>> But again, perhaps this is something we can wait for and handle in the
>>>>> RFE. The test folder already exists in the top repo.
>>>> The jdk/test/lib directory has been around for many years now and only
>>>> contains 28 files.  It seems unlikely that the root-repo equivalent will
>>>> ever be much larger than that, so a separate repo would be overkill.
>>> The corresponding directory in hotspot has 56 files and has expanded quite a bit recently. I expect some growth to continue. Many of these overlap with the files in the jdk directory, however.
>>> 
>>> /Staffan



More information about the jdk9-dev mailing list