RFR 6642881: Improve performance of Class.getClassLoader()
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Tue Jun 17 05:30:51 UTC 2014
On 17/06/2014 6:43 AM, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>
> On 6/16/14, 1:50 PM, roger riggs wrote:
>> Hi Colleen,
>>
>> In Class.java, if only the VM creates Class objects (comment at line
>> 681),
>> and it does not use the constructor then the code (line 136) in the
>> constructor
>> to set classloader is misleading and deserves a comment.
>
> Thanks, Roger. How about this comment?
>
> /*
> * Constructor. Only the Java Virtual Machine creates Class
> * objects, but this constructor prevents a warning that
> classLoader is not
> * initialized.
> */
> private Class(ClassLoader loader) {
> classLoader = loader;
> }
Why not just initialize classloader to null when it is declared and
leave the constructor alone? The constructor exists to prevent javac
from creating a default constructor, and thus ensuring Class instances
can not be created (which is what the original comment should, but
doesn't quite, say).
David
> Coleen
>>
>> Roger
>>
>> On 6/16/2014 1:45 PM, Lois Foltan wrote:
>>> Hi Coleen,
>>> This looks good.
>>> Lois
>>>
>>> On 6/16/2014 11:42 AM, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>>>> Summary: Add classLoader to java/lang/Class instance for fast access
>>>>
>>>> In order to improve performance of Class.getClassLoader() in a way
>>>> to allow the compilers to automatically optimize this call, I added
>>>> the classLoader to the instance of java/lang/Class. For
>>>> microbenchmarks, this results in a 98% improvement, which was
>>>> expected. For Oracle internal applications, this results in a
>>>> 10-12% improvement on solaris/sparc. The increase in size of
>>>> java/lang/Class can be offset by other changes (removing constant
>>>> pool lock, or removing signers).
>>>>
>>>> See bug link https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6642881 and
>>>> associated linked bugs for more details.
>>>>
>>>> open webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/6642881_hotspot/
>>>> open webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/6642881_jdk/
>>>>
>>>> There is both hotspot and jdk changes for this change. The hotspot
>>>> changes can work without the jdk changes (check for optional field),
>>>> but not vice-versa. I'll file another bug (and compatibility
>>>> request) to remove JVM_GetClassLoader from hotspot.
>>>>
>>>> Tested with jck lang, vm, api/java_lang tests with/without jdk
>>>> change, nsk vm.quick.testlist and hotspot jtreg tests, and jprt.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Coleen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
More information about the jdk9-dev
mailing list