RFR [JEP 220] Modular Run-Time Images

[Daniel Fuchs]

Hi Chris,

I had a look at the changes in java.logging and java.management modules
(+ corresponding tests) and they look reasonable to me.

I also had a cursory look at the jdeps changes. It's difficult for me
to review that without importing the changes and playing with the
tool as this is a part I'm less familiar with - but I didn't see
anything that would be obviously wrong.

I skipped most of the rest (especially the build changes ;-)).

best regards,

-- daniel

On 20/11/14 22:41, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
>> From: Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>
>> Subject: RFR [JEP 220] Modular Run-Time Images
>> Date: 20 November 2014 21:39:14 GMT
>> To: jigsaw-dev <jigsaw-dev at openjdk.java.net>, jdk9-dev <jdk9-dev at openjdk.java.net>, build-dev <build-dev at openjdk.java.net>, Alan Bateman <alan.bateman at oracle.com>, Alex Buckley <alex.buckley at oracle.com>, Chris Hegarty <chris.hegarty at oracle.com>, Erik Joelsson <erik.joelsson at oracle.com>, Jonathan Gibbons <jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com>, Karen Kinnear <karen.kinnear at oracle.com>, "Jim Laskey (Oracle)" <James.Laskey at oracle.com>, Magnus Ihse Bursie <magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com>, Mandy Chung <mandy.chung at oracle.com>, Mark Reinhold <mark.reinhold at oracle.com>, Paul Sandoz <paul.sandoz at oracle.com>, "A. Sundararajan" <sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com>
>>
>> This is a review request for the changes for JEP 220: Modular Run-Time Images [1].
>>
>> There are a number of individuals responsible for these changes. Some, possibly not all, are explicitly listed in the 'To' section of this mail, and they will help address any comments arising from this review request.
>>
>> The new run-time image structure is defined in JEP 220 [1], and can be seen as a result of building the staging forest [2], or in the early access builds [3].
>>
>> Webrevs:
>>    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8061971/00/
>>
>> Due to the significant impact of these changes, a JDK 9 promotion has been tentatively reserved for their integration. All comments are welcome, although given the nature of the changes then we might have to create separate issues in JIRA to address some of them later in jdk9/dev.
>>
>> -Chris.
>>
>> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/220
>> [2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/m2/
>> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/ea
>