RFR [JEP 220] Modular Run-Time Images
Magnus Ihse Bursie
magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com
Sun Nov 23 23:15:47 UTC 2014
On 2014-11-20 22:39, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> This is a review request for the changes for JEP 220: Modular Run-Time Images [1].
>
> There are a number of individuals responsible for these changes. Some, possibly not all, are explicitly listed in the 'To' section of this mail, and they will help address any comments arising from this review request.
>
> The new run-time image structure is defined in JEP 220 [1], and can be seen as a result of building the staging forest [2], or in the early access builds [3].
>
> Webrevs:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8061971/00/
I have thoroughly reviewed all the build changes, and they look good to
me, with the following remarks.
It would have been nice to use the new "wrapper" based approach for all
module-phase specific details -- this is done now for all phases except
gensrc and rmic. But this is not necessary for the patch to work, and
can be addressed later on.
We also need to update configure to accept a module-based JDK as a boot
JDK. In the patch, this is done sort-of -- we can run a bootcycle build
with the new module-based JDK, but we will not accept it as an initial
boot JDK. But this too can be fixed later on.
And of course there is always some syntax issues. :-) In
langtools/make/gensrc/Gensrc-jdk.*.gmk, there are several calls of the
pattern:
$(eval $(call SetupVersionProperties,JAVAP_VERSION, ...))
$(eval $(call SetupCompileProperties,COMPILE_PROPERTIES, ...))
These should have a space following the comma to adhere to the
recommended style. But once again, I'm okay with fixing this in a follow up.
/Magnus
More information about the jdk9-dev
mailing list