New staging repository for AArch64 open port

Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Mon Oct 6 18:41:47 UTC 2014


On 10/06/2014 06:48 PM, Iris Clark wrote:
> 
> As the Lead of the AArch64 Project, do you approve of the request to
> create this staging forest?  Do you want jcheck fully enabled
> (formatted changeset comment, Reviewers, etc.) so that you can
> preserve your history similar to what was done for the PPC/AIX Port?

Yes.  I'm putting myself in the hands of Vladimir here, but I'm pretty
sure we need jcheck.

I know that our existing revision history is not jcheck-compliant, so
it wouldn't be acceptable, but I am prepared to lose the history
because I'll be submitting clean webrevs.  The aarch64-project tree
will always be there for the archaeologists.

> Assuming that you do, then I'm going to need to investigate how to
> handle that configuration.  Minimally, if Vladimir needs to push he
> needs to be at least a Committer to the AArch64 Project.  Who do you
> anticipate the changeset authors to be?  They'd need to be at least
> Authors in both JDK 9 and AArch64.

I can't even remember if I am a JDK9 author, but at least me and
Andrew Dinn.  Edward Nevill is a major AArch64 contributor, but I
don't think he is a JDK9 author.

Thanks,
Andrew.


More information about the jdk9-dev mailing list