New staging repository for AArch64 open port
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Mon Oct 6 18:41:47 UTC 2014
On 10/06/2014 06:48 PM, Iris Clark wrote:
>
> As the Lead of the AArch64 Project, do you approve of the request to
> create this staging forest? Do you want jcheck fully enabled
> (formatted changeset comment, Reviewers, etc.) so that you can
> preserve your history similar to what was done for the PPC/AIX Port?
Yes. I'm putting myself in the hands of Vladimir here, but I'm pretty
sure we need jcheck.
I know that our existing revision history is not jcheck-compliant, so
it wouldn't be acceptable, but I am prepared to lose the history
because I'll be submitting clean webrevs. The aarch64-project tree
will always be there for the archaeologists.
> Assuming that you do, then I'm going to need to investigate how to
> handle that configuration. Minimally, if Vladimir needs to push he
> needs to be at least a Committer to the AArch64 Project. Who do you
> anticipate the changeset authors to be? They'd need to be at least
> Authors in both JDK 9 and AArch64.
I can't even remember if I am a JDK9 author, but at least me and
Andrew Dinn. Edward Nevill is a major AArch64 contributor, but I
don't think he is a JDK9 author.
Thanks,
Andrew.
More information about the jdk9-dev
mailing list