FYI: Build system rewrite in Ant

Remi Forax forax at univ-mlv.fr
Wed Apr 1 09:02:50 UTC 2015


On 04/01/2015 10:50 AM, Tomasz Kowalczewski wrote:
> Whole community of dynamic language developers would benefit from a meta circular build system ;)

yes, a meta-circular maven with the whole maven central in RAM !

Rémi

>
>> On 01 Apr 2015, at 10:41, Mario Torre <neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 2015-04-01 10:33 GMT+02:00 Magnus Ihse Bursie <magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com>:
>>> The build system currently uses make to build OpenJDK. This is a technology that has been around for decades, and in places this legacy clearly shows.
>>>
>>> An alternative build tool, Ant, is based on cutting-edge technology. Compared to the native GNU Make, Ant is based on Java™ technology, which makes portability issues a thing of the past. Ant is also directed using modern XML systems, with well-defined tags, compared to the aged and idiosyncratic Makefile syntax.
>> To be honest, I'm pretty disappointed by this move. In 2015 and with
>> the advancements in the JVM technology, I would have expected that
>> OpenJDK would be able to know how to build itself *without* a build
>> tool!!
>>
>> :)
>>
>> Mario
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
>> Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA  FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF
>>
>> Java Champion - Blog: http://neugens.wordpress.com - Twitter: @neugens
>> Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/
>> OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/
>>
>> Please, support open standards:
>> http://endsoftpatents.org/



More information about the jdk9-dev mailing list