JEPs proposed to target JDK 9 (2015/1/15)

A. Sundararajan sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com
Mon Jan 19 06:45:19 UTC 2015


Hi,

If the NodeVisitor interface includes default implementation that calls 
visitUnknown method, then your scheme could be implemented as 
visitUnknown override (i.e., Class->lambda selection logic and 
maintaining state etc).

Also, users can implement few selective visitABC methods - as the rest 
have default implementation - which is one of the advantages your scheme 
- selectively implement visit for only few types.

Thanks,
-Sundar

On Friday 16 January 2015 04:22 AM, Remi Forax wrote:
> On 01/15/2015 11:31 PM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>    236: Parser API for Nashorn http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/236
>>
>> Feedback on these proposals is more than welcome, as are reasoned
>> objections.  If no such objections are raised by 23:00 UTC next
>> Thursday, 22 January, or if they're raised and then satisfactorily
>> answered, then per the JEP 2.0 process proposal [1] I'll target
>> these JEPs to JDK 9.
>>
>> (This information is also available on the JDK 9 Project Page [2]).
>>
>> - Mark
>
> for JEP 236, I'm not sure that we need a visitor anymore along with 
> the AST, now that we have lambdas,
> a HashMap AST node -> function to execute, is enough.
>
> see for an example of usage
> https://github.com/forax/vmboiler/blob/master/script/src/com/github/forax/vmboiler/sample/script/TypeInferer.java#L46 
>
>
> and  the definition of a Visitor
> https://github.com/forax/vmboiler/blob/master/script/src/com/github/forax/vmboiler/sample/script/Visitor.java 
>
>
> Note: that this 'new visitor' doesn't need any support method (usually 
> named 'accept') defined on the AST node.
>
> cheers,
> Rémi
>



More information about the jdk9-dev mailing list