JEP 277: Enhanced Deprecation
Patrick Reinhart
patrick at reini.net
Sat Oct 31 12:32:05 UTC 2015
Hi,
On 30.10.2015 18:35, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
> thanks for starting work on this topic. Would love to help to implement
> some parts of this proposal.
I also would like to do some work in that area.
> For all thinks there seems always a choice between "find all possible
> cases" and "limit the false positives", which seems to me to be an
> important part for the adoption in the community.
That is also true for me.
In my opinion, we should also look at a implementers side, especially on
parts that have to be
implemented outside the JDK. What about interfaces or abstract methods
that are marked as
deperecated? A implementer should not be forced to implement such a
method in order to have
the chance to clean up it's code. In that case we would need to provide
a default method on a
interface or not allow to mark a abstract method as deprecated for the
time until this method
may would go away completely.
- Patrick
More information about the jdk9-dev
mailing list