JEP 277: Enhanced Deprecation

Patrick Reinhart patrick at reini.net
Sat Oct 31 12:32:05 UTC 2015


Hi,

On 30.10.2015 18:35, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
> thanks for starting work on this topic. Would love to help to implement
> some parts of this proposal.

I also would like to do some work in that area.

> For all thinks there seems always a choice between "find all possible
> cases" and "limit  the false positives", which seems to me to be an
> important part for the adoption in the community.
That is also true for me.

In my opinion, we should also look at a implementers side, especially on 
parts that have to be
implemented  outside the JDK. What about interfaces or abstract methods 
that are marked as
deperecated? A implementer should not be forced to implement such a 
method in order to have
the chance to clean up it's code. In that case we would need to provide 
a default method on a
interface or not allow to mark a abstract method as deprecated for the 
time until this method
may would go away completely.

- Patrick


More information about the jdk9-dev mailing list