[patch] JDK-4906983

Ivan Krylov ivan at azulsystems.com
Mon Sep 7 15:07:28 UTC 2015


My link [3] was not correct for this case, and yours is. Sorry about the 
confusion.

Ivan

On 07/09/2015 17:16, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> thanks for remembering. I have used another "username" (picpromusic) when i signed the SCA in back in 2010.
>
> See: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html
>
> Do I have to resign the OCA because i use a different "email-username"?
>
> -- Sebastian
>
> Am 07.09.2015 3:46 nachm. schrieb Ivan Krylov <ivan at azulsystems.com>:
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>> The current OpenJDK rules [1] do not allow to accept patches from people
>> that are not OCA signatories.
>> If you would like your patch to be considered - please sign the OCA[2],
>> that will be reflected at [3].
>> The process of becoming an OpenJDK contributor is described at [4].
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ivan
>>
>>
>> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws
>> [2] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/oca-405177.pdf
>> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/census
>> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
>>
>>
>> On 06/09/2015 09:58, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
>>> Please find my small patch[1] to javadoc in java.net.URL that adresses
>>> JDK-4906983(javadoc-fix)[2].
>>>
>>> -- Sebastian
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/43692695/oss-patches/openjdk/JDK-4906983/index.html
>>> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4906983
>>>



More information about the jdk9-dev mailing list