[patch] JDK-4906983

Sebastian Sickelmann sebastian.sickelmann at gmx.de
Tue Sep 8 20:04:03 UTC 2015


Thanks,

I have now posted a new Thread on the right list (net-dev), i think it
should be continued there.

-- Sebastian

Am 08.09.2015 um 08:08 schrieb david buck:
> Hi Sebastian!
>
> Please feel free to use this URL for your code review:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/4906983.0/
>
> If during the course of your review you need to make changes to your
> patch, please generate a new webrev and mail it to me, and I will host
> it for you.
>
> [ Webrev Help ]
> http://openjdk.java.net/guide/webrevHelp.html
>
> Cheers,
> -Buck
>
> On 2015/09/08 14:30, david buck wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'll generate a webrev and host it on cr.openjdk.java.net. I will send
>> out the link soon.
>>
>> I am also happy to push the change assuming it passes all necessary code
>> review.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Buck
>>
>> On 2015/09/08 13:56, David Holmes wrote:
>>> Hi Sebastian,
>>>
>>> On 8/09/2015 1:54 PM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> please find the link to the webrev[1] hosted at my dropbox in my first
>>>> mail in this thread at the buttom of this mail.
>>>>
>>>> A direkt link to the including patch file can be found here:
>>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/43692695/oss-patches/openjdk/JDK-4906983/jdk.patch
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Another rule is that all submitted patches must come in via OpenJDK
>>> infrustructure so they fall under the term-of-use [1] - either within
>>> the email to the list (though attachments get stripped often), or
>>> hosted
>>> on cr.openjdk.java.net. An OpenJDK Author can host the patch on
>>> cr.openjdk.java.net on your behalf.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> David
>>>
>>> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/legal/tou/terms
>>>
>>>
>>>> -- Sebastian
>>>>
>>>> Am 08.09.2015 2:03 vorm. schrieb David Holmes
>>>> <david.holmes at oracle.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/09/2015 11:46 PM, Ivan Krylov wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Sebastian,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The current OpenJDK rules [1] do not allow to accept patches from
>>>>>> people
>>>>>> that are not OCA signatories.
>>>>>
>>>>> For the record, small patches can be accepted:
>>>>>
>>>>> "A Participant is an individual who has subscribed to one or more
>>>>> OpenJDK mailing lists. A Participant may post messages to a list,
>>>>> submit
>>>>> simple patches, and make other kinds of small contributions.
>>>>>
>>>>> A Contributor is a Participant who has signed the Oracle Contributor
>>>>> Agreement (OCA), ..."
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> I did not see the referenced patch so don't know if it would be
>>>>> considered small or not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> David
>>>>>
>>>>>> If you would like your patch to be considered - please sign the
>>>>>> OCA[2],
>>>>>> that will be reflected at [3].
>>>>>> The process of becoming an OpenJDK contributor is described at [4].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ivan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws
>>>>>> [2] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/oca-405177.pdf
>>>>>> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/census
>>>>>> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06/09/2015 09:58, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote:
>>>>>>> Please find my small patch[1] to javadoc in java.net.URL that
>>>>>>> adresses
>>>>>>> JDK-4906983(javadoc-fix)[2].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- Sebastian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/43692695/oss-patches/openjdk/JDK-4906983/index.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4906983
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>
>



More information about the jdk9-dev mailing list