jtreg failing in awt tests

Martin Buchholz martinrb at google.com
Wed Nov 23 21:19:44 UTC 2016


Jonathan: Here's a small jtreg feature request:
It's nice for release engineers to have jtreg check the whole test/ tree
for correct test definitions.  But for developers who are just doing

jtreg MyTest.java

they're not interested in awt failures, and don't want to pay the 10-second
tax to check every test definition for every jtreg invocation.

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Jonathan Gibbons <
jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 11/23/2016 12:47 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>
>> Am I the only one seeing jtreg test failures in latest jdk9/dev,
>> apparently due to
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8160766
>>
>> Error: Test clashes with another test with a similar name:
>> .../jdk/test/java/awt/Focus/DisposedWindow/DisposeDialogNotA
>> ctivateOwnerTest/DisposeDialogNotActivateOwnerTest.java
>>  .../jdk/test/java/awt/Focus/DisposedWindow/DisposeDialogNot
>> ActivateOwnerTest/DisposeDialogNotActivateOwnerTest.html
>>
>> (even though I'm not actually running any of the awt tests?)
>>
>
>
> Martin,
>
> It looks like this is a test bug, introduced in this changeset.
>
> changeset:   16112:88faebbdbf9b
> user:        arapte
> date:        Fri Nov 04 21:55:19 2016 +0530
> summary:     8160766: [TEST_BUG] java/awt/Focus/DisposedWindow
>
>
> The problem edit looks like this:
>
>
>  /*
> -  test
> -  @bug       6386592
> -  @summary   Tests that disposing a dialog doesn't activate its invisible
> owner.
> -  @author    anton.tarasov at sun.com: area=awt.focus
> -  @run       applet DisposeDialogNotActivateOwnerTest.html
> +  @test
> +  @key headful
> +  @bug 6386592 8160766
> +  @summary Tests that disposing a dialog doesn't activate its invisible
> owner.
>  */
>
> Note that plain "test" was edited to "@test", meaning that the file
> previously was not a standalone jtreg test, and it was changed to be one.
> This causes a clash with an HTML test of the same base name.
>
> jtreg correctly reports the clash, because both tests would lead to the
> same .jtr file.  i.e. you can't have two tests that only differ in their
> filename extension.
>
> -- Jon
>


More information about the jdk9-dev mailing list