JDK 9 Rampdown Phase 2: Process proposal
joe darcy
joe.darcy at oracle.com
Mon Mar 20 17:28:40 UTC 2017
Hello,
On 3/16/2017 3:51 PM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
[snip]
> JDK 9 Committers are invited to comment on this process proposal. If
> no serious objections are raised in one week's time, by 23:00 UTC next
> Thursday, 23 March, then this qnexiis the process that we'll use.
A few other situations which might merit explicit consideration:
* Backing out a change: Despite reasonable care being taken, there are
times that after a change is pushed the change is found to be
problematic. If the problems are severe enough, the change needs to be
backed out quickly while the fix is reworked or reconsidered. Perhaps
backing a change could just be subject to normal code review procedures.
* Problem list maintenance: to deal with unexpected test failures, we've
often wanted to update the problem list within a few hours of a
changeset going in. For example, a fix is generally fine, but causing an
unexpected test failure in another area. It would be helpful for problem
list updates to be handled under the "noreg-self" rules.
-Joe
More information about the jdk9-dev
mailing list