From adam.farley at uk.ibm.com  Tue May  7 16:17:11 2019
From: adam.farley at uk.ibm.com (Adam Farley8)
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 17:17:11 +0100
Subject: jep-changes: Should this list be archived?
Message-ID: <OFB9F9FEE4.6494C91A-ON002583F3.0058A2BB-802583F3.0059772D@notes.na.collabserv.com>

Hi All,

Does anyone here think this list should/shouldn't be archived?

I mean that in a nice way, as I don't want to pursue archiving a list if 
people are still using it, or plan to.

More details on this list-archiving push here: 
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8220662

List owners were contacted 3 weeks ago, and this is a follow-up for lists 
whose owners haven't replied yet.

Best Regards

Adam Farley 
IBM Runtimes
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jep-changes/attachments/20190507/2fa13b15/attachment.html>

From fweimer at redhat.com  Tue May  7 17:22:10 2019
From: fweimer at redhat.com (Florian Weimer)
Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 19:22:10 +0200
Subject: jep-changes: Should this list be archived?
In-Reply-To: <OFB9F9FEE4.6494C91A-ON002583F3.0058A2BB-802583F3.0059772D@notes.na.collabserv.com>
 (Adam Farley8's message of "Tue, 7 May 2019 17:17:11 +0100")
References: <OFB9F9FEE4.6494C91A-ON002583F3.0058A2BB-802583F3.0059772D@notes.na.collabserv.com>
Message-ID: <87o94e41tp.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>

* Adam Farley8:

> I mean that in a nice way, as I don't want to pursue archiving a list
> if people are still using it, or plan to.

What's a good way to stay informed about new JEPs and changes to
existing JEPs?

This list is obviously unused, so it can be archived, but I wonder what
the replacement is.

Thanks,
Florian

From adam.farley at uk.ibm.com  Wed May  8 12:46:52 2019
From: adam.farley at uk.ibm.com (Adam Farley8)
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 13:46:52 +0100
Subject: jep-changes: Should this list be archived?
In-Reply-To: <87o94e41tp.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
References: <OFB9F9FEE4.6494C91A-ON002583F3.0058A2BB-802583F3.0059772D@notes.na.collabserv.com>
 <87o94e41tp.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <OFE81905BE.0830AAD0-ON002583F4.0045E47C-802583F4.0046365F@notes.na.collabserv.com>

That's a very good question.

platform-jep-discuss, maybe? Though that does seem quite dormant.

Maybe someone in the discuss list will know. I'll shoot them a message and 
cc you.

Best Regards

Adam Farley 
IBM Runtimes


Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat.com> wrote on 07/05/2019 18:22:10:

> From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat.com>
> To: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com>
> Cc: jep-changes at openjdk.java.net
> Date: 07/05/2019 18:22
> Subject: Re: jep-changes: Should this list be archived?
> 
> * Adam Farley8:
> 
> > I mean that in a nice way, as I don't want to pursue archiving a list
> > if people are still using it, or plan to.
> 
> What's a good way to stay informed about new JEPs and changes to
> existing JEPs?
> 
> This list is obviously unused, so it can be archived, but I wonder what
> the replacement is.
> 
> Thanks,
> Florian
> 

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jep-changes/attachments/20190508/a2c58b8b/attachment.html>