jep-changes: Should this list be archived?

[Adam Farley8]

That's a very good question.

platform-jep-discuss, maybe? Though that does seem quite dormant.

Maybe someone in the discuss list will know. I'll shoot them a message and 
cc you.

Best Regards

Adam Farley 
IBM Runtimes


Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat.com> wrote on 07/05/2019 18:22:10:

> From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat.com>
> To: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com>
> Cc: jep-changes at openjdk.java.net
> Date: 07/05/2019 18:22
> Subject: Re: jep-changes: Should this list be archived?
> 
> * Adam Farley8:
> 
> > I mean that in a nice way, as I don't want to pursue archiving a list
> > if people are still using it, or plan to.
> 
> What's a good way to stay informed about new JEPs and changes to
> existing JEPs?
> 
> This list is obviously unused, so it can be archived, but I wonder what
> the replacement is.
> 
> Thanks,
> Florian
> 

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jep-changes/attachments/20190508/a2c58b8b/attachment.html>