Code changes required after JDK-8291473
Maurizio Cimadamore
maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com
Fri Aug 5 11:31:49 UTC 2022
Hi Filip,
due to various complex reasons, it is currently not possible for us to
release binary snapshots using GitHub actions. All the binaries we
publish come from an internal CI pipeline, which builds and test using
predefined, well-known configurations, so that we can ensure repeatable
results. While this is not set in stone, and OpenJDK is relatively new
to GitHub workflows, I think that, for the time being, we have to work
with what we've got.
That said, nothing prevents us from creating several internal pipelines,
one per jextract version, and add a new one every 6 months or so,
perhaps with some policy to "garbage collect" old pipelines (e.g. maybe
providing binaries up to JDK N-3 would be a good starting point?) -
although I'd have to check with the infra team and see what solution
they'd be most comfortable with.
P.S. While it would be possible, in principle, for 3rd parties to build
snapshots of jextract, I find that solution less ideal. Plugins such as
yours need a stable link to work with. A 3rd party build might be a
great place to get started (or where to get more frequent jextract
binary updates, for example), but doesn't provide (by design) that kind
of long-term commitment that some of the tools in the ecosystem would
require, at least IMHO.
Thanks
Maurizio
On 05/08/2022 11:23, Filip Krakowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it a question of maintainability (diverging branches in case of
> patches, etc.), which would stand in the way of this, or a question of
> the infrastructure that would be required? In the latter case, I could
> try to set something up to accomplish the job of automatically
> creating releases from each pushed tag matching a version number.
>
> Since the project is hosted on GitHub, I could implement a GitHub
> Action, which would be triggered on each pushed tag. This Action would
> then compile the code for different platforms (Linux, macOS, Windows -
> GitHub provides images for each), create a release inside the
> repository and attach the created binaries to it. The repository
> already contains a GitHub Action for building and testing jextract,
> which I could use as a starting point.
>
> Best regards,
> Filip
>
> On 04.08.22 21:14, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
>>
>> On 04/08/2022 20:08, Filip Krakowski wrote:
>>> Each branch would therefore only produce binaries when it receives a
>>> new tag. Could this work?
>>
>> I'd have to check - my feeling is that, no that would not be possible.
>>
>> Another issue is that we'd need to keep updating the main github
>> branch every few months (not a big issue).
>>
>> Maurizio
>>
>>
>
More information about the jextract-dev
mailing list