RFR: 7903609: Jextract can not handle some anonymous nested structs [v2]
    Maurizio Cimadamore 
    mcimadamore at openjdk.org
       
    Wed Dec 13 18:09:11 UTC 2023
    
    
  
On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:54:12 GMT, Jorn Vernee <jvernee at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/main/java/org/openjdk/jextract/impl/TreeMaker.java line 343:
>> 
>>> 341:      * };
>>> 342:      */
>>> 343:     private static OptionalLong offsetOfAnonymousRecord(Cursor outermostParent, Cursor anonRecord, Cursor record) {
>> 
>> What about DeclarationImpl::recordMemberOffset ? Is that still used? UnsupportedTypeFilter and StructBuilder depend on that for skipping - is is still the case that the anon record offset might be missing?
>
> yes, it's still used. The offset of an anon struct might be missing if it doesn't have any named fields nested inside. In that case, the offset is OptionalLong.empty(), and the UnsupportedFilter adds a Skip to the record: https://github.com/openjdk/jextract/blob/e790205da93c4aacd8524064d0f109d637b99161/src/main/java/org/openjdk/jextract/impl/UnsupportedFilter.java#L231-L233
Uhm - but shouldn't that function use the new attribute that you set?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jextract/pull/159#discussion_r1425711322
    
    
More information about the jextract-dev
mailing list