Converting plain JARs to Java modules

[David M. Lloyd]

I'll just state now that using packages as a dependency unit is a 
terrible idea, and not some architectural revelation.  That way, Peter's 
wrath will be largely directed at me. :-)

On 11/09/2011 08:02 AM, Peter Kriens wrote:
> I agree that tools are needed but we must be careful to not expect tools to stopgap an architectural issue. I think it is important to first do good architectural design leveraging existing tools (e.g. the Java type system) before you try to add new tools. It is such a pity (but all to common) that a design allows for classes of errors that would be impossible with a slightly different design.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> 	Peter Kriens
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 9 nov. 2011, at 14:49, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
>> On 09/11/2011 13:04, Peter Kriens wrote:
>>> The issue is that maven problems are not caused because maven is bad or that pom authors are stupid. The reason is that the module-to-module dependency architecture in maven (and Jigsaw) is error prone ...
>> This thread started out with someone asking about adding module declarations to existing JAR files, and in that context, I agree it can be error prone without good tools. I think things should be a lot better when modules are compiled.
>>
>> -Alan.
>>
>


-- 
- DML