Transcript for yesterday's IRC meeting

Brian Pontarelli brian at pontarelli.com
Sat Oct 22 14:20:10 PDT 2011


We could try. I know there are developers that aren't on the jigsaw-dev list but are involved in discussions in other places. Plus, the Jigsaw list seems directly related to internal development of Jigsaw. Using a separate list would allow discuss of concepts outside of Jigsaw and promote a wider community involvement.

-bp


On Oct 22, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Kevin Krouse wrote:

> Why not just use the jigsaw mailing list?
> 
> Kevin
> 
> 
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Brian Pontarelli <brian at pontarelli.com> wrote:
> 
> On Oct 22, 2011, at 7:54 AM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
> 
> > On 10/22/2011 04:11 AM, Neil Bartlett wrote:
> >>  Hello jigsaw-dev,
> >>
> >> Is a transcript available from the IRC meeting on ##java-modularity/freenode yesterday (21 Oct)?
> >
> > Yeah I was going to post a follow-up in my blog and here but I haven't had a chance.  The transcript URL is http://is.gd/XaTjFN (for the time being anyway).  I have kept the channel /topic updated so you can always drop in and get the latest URLs and information.
> >
> > Looks like it's going to be a weekly thing.
> 
> There is also a discussion going on about the meeting on the Maven list and there is some potential for discussions on other lists as well. To help reduce the amount of noise and duplication, I create a Google Group that we should try to get everyone that is interested to use.
> 
> I'm also planning on using this list for additional discussions that might fall outside the scope of Jigsaw. Specifically, I want to discuss dependency management tools and standardization of dependency meta-data. This will apply for Java 1.7 and below.
> 
> Here is the info:
> 
> web: http://groups.google.com/group/java-modularity
> email: java-modularity at googlegroups.com
> 
> -bp
> 




More information about the jigsaw-dev mailing list