Late for the train

[David Bosschaert]

On 20 July 2012 01:46, Eric Johnson <eric at tibco.com> wrote:
> On 7/19/12 5:06 PM, Alex Buckley wrote:
>> Hence a module is declared via a Java language construct with syntax
>> similar to constructs which declare other entities (classes, interfaces).
>
>
> And *even if* you think that this should result in changes to the recognized
> keywords in ".java" files, and an input file that uses a special ".java"
> name to carry said info, there's still no reason that the output has to be a
> .class file, after the darn thing is compiled.
>
> Those are all implementation choices. And from discussions we've had, there
> are many folks such as myself that think that those implementation choices
> come at an unnecessary cost. Different implementation choices might be
> better.

+1. Totally agree, Eric.

David