Case - class from required module is not available

[Mandy Chung]

On 3/27/2012 6:48 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>> This is an interesting scenario - module c is linked with module b only
>> whereas module d is linked with module a only.
>
> So is that a bug or a feature? Given b will not be able to find a<1.0, 
> but a1.0 is already loaded, is it then necessary that b not be linked 
> to d?

I consider it's not a bug as a module be resolved should have all of its 
dependences satisfied with all the modules in the resolution graph (i.e. 
module a is present in the graph and b -> a has to be satisfied for b to 
be resolved).

Mark, what do you think?

Mandy