JEP 200: The Modular JDK
Eric Johnson
eric at tibco.com
Tue Aug 5 17:26:05 UTC 2014
Thanks for sharing that with the jigsaw-dev mailing list.
Quick question: Why does this JEP need to make assumptions 4, 5, and 6?
Seems like assuming existing classpath semantics is good enough for this
JEP. Seems like these additional constraints just bring in a lot of text
about re-exporting, when, for the purposes of modularizing the JRE & JDK,
such technical details could be left to the module system, rather than
here. Did I miss something?
Eric.
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:49 AM, <mark.reinhold at oracle.com> wrote:
> New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/200
>
> - Mark
>
More information about the jigsaw-dev
mailing list