Jigsaw Hackday in London - Anything in particular you want us to look at?

[Vitaly Davidovich]

Hi Alan,

Regarding use of internal APIs  - what is the plan for Unsafe? I recall
some discussion about possibly making it a proper public API, but don't
recall seeing anything finalized.

Thanks

sent from my phone
On Jun 23, 2015 7:10 AM, "Alan Bateman" <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com> wrote:

> On 23/06/2015 10:34, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As part of the Adoption Group we're planning on holding a Hackday in
>> London
>> for the July/Aug timeframe, primarily as an education/awareness piece
>> around Jigsaw (there's lots to catch up on).
>>
>> Is there anything in particular you'd like a group of 'users'/developers
>> to
>> look at?  I assume basing this off the latest jdk9 forest will be more
>> stable than the jigsaw forest.
>>
>>  I would expect/hope that JSR 376 will be further along by then so there
> may be more to talk about and play with at this event.
>
> In the mean-time there is a lot to discuss and prepare. We've been warning
> (and javac has emitted warnings) for many years that JDK-internal APIs will
> not be accessible out of the box so anything that reduces or eliminates
> dependences on internal APIs in popular libraries will be a big help. It
> might be fun to use jdeps on the say the 20 most popular libraries to get a
> feel for the problem.
>
> We've had the initial changes for JEP 220 in JDK 9 for about 6 months.
> This is the JEP that changes the structure of the run-time images. This has
> implications for tools (mostly) that have been used to directly accessing
> rt.jar and other internal files in the legacy images. JEP 220 comes with a
> supported interface for accessing classes and resources in the run-time
> image so that may be worth spending time on. There is a refresh of this in
> flight and it should be in by the time you have this event. It might be fun
> to try out the top 20 tools and plugins to see if they run with JDK 9 and
> maybe even hack on one or two of them to use the FileSystem API.
>
> Another idea is to look at the module graph in JEP 200, or better still,
> the most up to date graph of modules in the JDK 9 forests. One idea is to
> hack on make/Images.gmk in the top-level repository to force the JDK build
> to produce run-time with a subset of the modules. The primitive image
> building tool that this make file runs will be replaced by a linker tool in
> time but there is enough to hack on to get a feel for the modules and what
> might run (or not run) with a small set of modules. The module graph is
> essentially an API so any feedback or usage of that API would be useful too.
>
> -Alan
>