Question on Implied readability

[Alan Bateman]

On 02/11/2015 20:02, Ali Ebrahimi wrote:
> :
> layer2.modules() [module com.foo, module com.bar] layer1.modules() 
> [module com.baz, module com.bar] foo.canRead(bar2) -> false 
> foo.canRead(bar1) -> false
Thanks, I see the issue. The reason it didn't duplicate for me is 
because I hadn't dropped the requires com.bar.

So the bug is implied readability across layers when the same named 
module exists in multiple layers. In this case com.foo should read 
com.bar at 1. The com.bar (@2) is the same configuration as com.foo is 
confusing the code. We'll need to fix this.

-Alan