RFR: 8078820: Test deploying a XML parser as a module

huizhe wang huizhe.wang at oracle.com
Mon Apr 18 16:28:26 UTC 2016


On 4/17/2016 10:57 PM, Frank Yuan wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: huizhe wang [mailto:huizhe.wang at oracle.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2016 12:39 AM
>> To: Frank Yuan <frank.yuan at oracle.com>
>> Cc: 'Alan Bateman' <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com>; jigsaw-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: Re: RFR: 8078820: Test deploying a XML parser as a module
>>
>>
>> On 4/14/2016 12:43 AM, Frank Yuan wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: huizhe wang [mailto:huizhe.wang at oracle.com]
>>>> Subject: Re: RFR: 8078820: Test deploying a XML parser as a module
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4/13/2016 5:55 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>>>> On 11/04/2016 02:39, Frank Yuan wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Alan and Joe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would you like to have a look at this review
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyuan/8078820/webrev.01/ ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I skimmed through the tests and they are testing the right scenarios.
>>>>>
>>>>> I assume you'll work with Joe to get this into jdk9/dev/jaxp.
>>>> Frank,
>>>>
>>>> Is it because of the use of jdk.testlibrary, e.g.
>>>> jdk.testlibrary.ProcessTools that you had to put the tests in the jdk
>> repo?  Is it possible to make a copy of the testlibrary or
>>> the
>>>> particular functions needed so that we can get this into jdk9/dev/jaxp?
>>>>
>>> Hi Joe and Alan
>>>
>>> I moved the test to jdk9/dev/jaxp with copying the necessary files
>>> from
>> jdk/test/lib/testlibrary to
>>> jaxp/test/javax/xml/jaxp/libs/jdk/testlibrary, and I have to create a
>> separate directory jaxp/test/javax/xml/jaxp/module for these
>>> new tests because the tests under the existent directories use
>> TestNG.dirs property, that causes all java files will be compiled
>>> once jtreg runs the test, but the module tests need to control the
>> compilation by itself.
>>
>> Is there such a support/plan from jtreg? I wonder if this is the new norm for writing / adding tests with module support.
>>
> I expect but no such support now, now all similar tests take this way...

Ok. I'm fine with your patch then.

Thanks,
Joe

>
> Frank
>
>> Joe
>>
>>> Please check the new webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyuan/8078820/webrev.02/ , Thanks!
>>>
>>> Frank
>>>
>>>> -Joe
>>>>
>>>>> -Alan
>



More information about the jigsaw-dev mailing list