Review Request JDK-8136930 Examine implications for custom launchers, equivalent of java -X options in particular
mark.reinhold at oracle.com
mark.reinhold at oracle.com
Wed Jun 15 22:03:47 UTC 2016
2016/6/13 5:13:20 -0700, coleen.phillimore at oracle.com:
> Hi Mark, Thank you for replying. Yes, I understand below.
>
> I have to explain that my exposure to this started with the code
> review. That is, working backwards from this design. So it led me to
> question the design and I hope that this is something temporary until a
> a better solution can be found. I agree that it's a non-trivial problem
> and urgent for jdk9 adoption.
>
> Yes, the JVM and JDK are part of a greater whole but the whole is a lot
> of software that should have proper encapsulation or the whole thing
> becomes very difficult to enhance and maintain. Because these options
> were added to the JVM they needed to be added to a 93 clause 'if'
> statement in argument processing for special cases.
>
> I'm discussing this with the developers and hopefully we'll arrive at
> some good solution.
Glad to hear it. Thanks for your understanding.
- Mark
More information about the jigsaw-dev
mailing list